June 14, 2009
June 14, 2009
June 17, 2009
14.518.1 - 14.518.11
EFFECTIVE: Exploring a Framework for Evaluating Courses on Technology In Various Environments
There is an urgent need for all Americans to better understand the wide variety of technology used everyday. Technological literacy is important at both an individual and national level. In two reports: Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More about Technology (2002), and Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy (2006), the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), has outlined the characteristics of a technologically literate citizen. The NAE defines the term technological literacy as an understanding of all types of technology not just computers and information technology. Technological literate citizens have a broad comprehension of the diverse products of all the engineering professions. The International Technology Education Association (ITEA) and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) have also produced standards that include an understanding of technology. Creating a population with a more thorough understanding of technology will require an extensive effort by educators at undergraduate institutions. Courses and materials that are easily adoptable in diverse and varied colleges and universities will be needed. Recognizing the need for standardized and readily adoptable undergraduate courses on this topic, the NSF supported a working group lead by the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Technological Literacy Constituent Committee. This group met on March 26-27, 2007 and adopted four models to serve as standardized courses on technology. In this work, a framework for specific course outlines consistent with the content areas established in Tech Tally of: technology and society, design, products and systems, and technology core concepts and the ITEA technology topic areas was created. To help instructors to satisfy the requirements of curriculum committees on varied campuses, the framework offers flexibility in configuring courses within each proposed model while still accomplishing the intent of the standards. This framework will be used in creating a repository of course materials that will be accessible online to assist course developers and instructors. The framework will help faculty develop expertise in adapting existing innovative course materials and standards for defining technological literacy and incorporating them efficiently into their own courses.
Technology affects nearly every aspect of our lives, and informed citizens need an understanding of what technology is, how it works, how it is created, how it shapes society, and how society influences technological development. How well American citizens understand these issues depends in large part on their level of technological literacy.
In their 2006 report, Tech Tally , the NAE defined technological literacy as “an understanding of technology at a level that enables effective functioning in a modern technological society”. Tech Tally was a follow-up to a 2002 report by the NAE entitled, Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More about Technology, which describes the importance of being knowledgeable about technology in the 21st century . Both NAE reports define technology, in a broad sense, as any modification of the natural world made to fulfill human needs and wants.
Krupczak, J., & Simpson, T., & Bertsch, V., & Disney, K., & Garmire, E. (2009, June), Effective: Exploring A Framework For Evaluating Courses On Technology In Various Environments Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/4867
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2009 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015