Asee peer logo

Effective Teaching: The Students’ Perspective

Download Paper |

Conference

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Publication Date

June 22, 2008

Start Date

June 22, 2008

End Date

June 25, 2008

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Tagged Division

New Engineering Educators

Page Count

10

Page Numbers

13.469.1 - 13.469.10

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/4318

Download Count

28

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Adrian Ieta Murray State University

visit author page

Adrian Ieta holds a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering (2004) from The University of Western Ontario, Canada. He also holds a B.Sc. in Physics from the University of Timisoara, Romania (1984), a B.E.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from the Polytechnical University of Timisoara (1992), and an M.E.Sc. from The University of Western Ontario (1999). He worked on industrial projects within the Applied Electrostatics Research Centre and the Digital Electronics Research Group at the University of Western Ontario and is an IEEE member and a registered Professional Engineer of Ontario. He taught at the University of Western Ontario and is now Assistant Professor at Murray State University, Department of Engineering and Physics.

visit author page

biography

Thomas Doyle McMaster University

visit author page

Thomas E. Doyle holds a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering Science (2006) from The University of Western Ontario, Canada. He also holds a B.E.Sc. in Electrical and Computer Engineering, a B.Sc. in Computer Science, and an M.E.Sc in Electrical and Computer Engineering from The University of Western Ontario. He worked on industrial projects with PlasSep Ltd, within the Applied Electrostatics Research Centre and the Digital Electronics Research Group at The University of Western Ontario and is an IEEE member and a registered Professional Engineer of Ontario. He taught at the University of Western Ontario and is currently Assistant Professor at McMaster University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.

visit author page

biography

Arthur Pallone

visit author page

Art Pallone holds a Ph.D in Applied Physics from the Colorado School of Mines (2000) in Golden, CO USA. He also holds an M.S. in Applied Physics from Indiana University of Pennsylvania (1995) and a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Michigan (1991). From 2000 to 2003, he held a Davies Fellows Postdoctoral Teaching and Research appointment cosponsored by the United States Military Academy and the U.S. Army Research Laboratory. He is now an Assistant Professor at Murray State University in the Department of Engineering and Physics.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Effective Teaching: The Students’ Perspective Teaching evaluations are a very useful instrument for instructors and often have great importance for tenure and promotions. Particularly, new faculty may encounter difficulties in identifying the factors that effectively influence students' decisions about evaluation scores. There are many interesting questions in the evaluation questionnaire, but many times only the scores for a few questions are relevant for tenure and promotion decisions. We selected four questions of particular interest: "the course as a whole was...?"; "the course content was...?"; "the instructor's contribution to the course was...?"; "the instructor's effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was...?". A preliminary survey asked students to identify their specific judgment process related to the scores they assign to these questions. Student responses were analyzed and aggregated into categories. The results of our analysis are likely to be of interest to new faculty trying to improve their teaching evaluation scores. However, they may be useful to others involved in education, as the practical factors suggested by students may not always be obvious.

1. Introduction Students routinely evaluate their instructors’ performance; this feedback is always welcome as instructors can reflect on the students’ perceptions and attempt to improve their teaching methods. Education institutions use student evaluations of teaching (SET) to establish the quality of instructors’ work as well as for tenure, promotions, retention, and salary raise purposes. SET and their interpretations therefore have significant importance and have been widely treated in the literature. There are various opinions regarding the validity of SET as a measure of the instructors’ work quality. Gillmore [1] shows that adequate instructor reliability rating is achieved when aggregating across about seven classes and that it becomes especially strong when aggregating across 15 or more classes under specific testing conditions. Therefore, the study concludes that decision-making based on Instructional Assessment System is valid but limited to similar conditions of measurement. Moreover, the analyzed data came only from the University of Washington and may not translate correctly to other campuses [1].

Some studies show that the relationship between grading practices and SET is especially important. It was argued, for instance, that instructors can increase SET scores by inflating grades or grade expectations [2-6]. Student perceived learning and characteristics such as course level and interest in the subject appear to account for much of the grade–SET relation [7]. Given that SET scores can be inflated by higher grades, adjustment methods were proposed [8]. However, there is disagreement regarding the implementation of SET corrections [9]. The validity of SET as measure of teaching effectiveness was strongly questioned in the 1970’s [10]. More recently, it was argued that student ratings are of little help to instructors willing to improve them if not supported by professional advice [11]. The hypothesis that the instructor’s look is a relevant factor to SET was dismissed by a recent study [12]. More general concerns are related to how effectively SET ratings are actually used [9].

Ieta, A., & Doyle, T., & Pallone, A. (2008, June), Effective Teaching: The Students’ Perspective Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. https://peer.asee.org/4318

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015