Virtual On line
June 22, 2020
June 22, 2020
June 26, 2021
First-Year Programs
16
10.18260/1-2--34503
https://peer.asee.org/34503
475
Lakshmy Mohandas is a third year PhD student in the department of Technology at Purdue University. Her research interest lies in methods to improve student motivation and learning experience in higher education. She is also passionate about teaching and has been teaching a design thinking course for undergraduate freshmen in Purdue polytechnic since 2017.
Nathan Mentzer is an associate professor in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Hired as a part of the strategic P12 STEM initiative, he prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacher licensure. Dr. Mentzer’s educational efforts in pedagogical content knowledge are guided by a research theme centered in student learning of engineering design thinking on the secondary level. Nathan was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.
Aparajita Jaiswal is a Ph.D. student at Purdue Polytechnic at Purdue University, West Lafayette. Her research interests are in educational technology, embodied learning, student engagement and motivation in active learning environments.
Shawn Farrington is a Senior Lecturer in the Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University. He co-coordinates a first-year Design Thinking program and teaches several of his own sections. Shawn is also an Educational Psychology Ph.D. candidate at Purdue. His research interest includes student motivation in core college courses.
This complete research paper focuses on the effectiveness of Undergraduate Teaching Assistants (UGTAs) in a first-year college level design course. Engaging undergraduate students as undergraduate teaching assistants is a common practice in higher education. In a freshman level design course where creativity and open-ended problems are posed to students, we notice that our UGTAs are appreciated by students (from end of semester survey) and have positive interactions. We also notice that some UGTAs seem to be higher performing than others. In order to hire and develop high quality UGTAs, this study investigated undergraduate students’ perspectives of what makes a highly effective UGTA. Through our study, we measured the impact of undergraduate teaching assistants (UGTAs) in the classroom using a survey and investigated what key strategies undergraduate teaching assistants use to impact the student experience using focus group data. The study followed a sequential explanatory mixed method format in which UGTAs teaching quality survey results were analyzed to find whether the UGTAs were valuable co-teachers in class. Qualitative data were collected in the form of in-depth focus group interviews to identify what made the students appreciate and value UGTA in class and what does it look like to be effective in class. Quantitative data suggest that UGTAs are highly effective although student perception varies across students of the same UGTA and across sections. Qualitative data suggest four themes of highly effective UGTAs: they are easy to interact with, they are qualified, they immerse themselves within the work of their peers and they are overtly collegial with the instructor of the course.
Mohandas, L., & Mentzer, N., & Jaiswal, A., & Farrington, S. (2020, June), Effectiveness of Undergraduate Teaching Assistants in a First-Year Design Course Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--34503
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2020 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015