Asee peer logo

Eight Dimensional Methodology For Innovative Thinking And The Case Of The Mount Graham Large Binocular Telescope

Download Paper |

Conference

2003 Annual Conference

Location

Nashville, Tennessee

Publication Date

June 22, 2003

Start Date

June 22, 2003

End Date

June 25, 2003

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Student Teams and Active Learning

Page Count

19

Page Numbers

8.473.1 - 8.473.19

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/11745

Download Count

19

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Daniel Raviv

author page

Rosalyn Berne

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 2330

Eight-Dimensional Methodology for Innovative Thinking About the Case and Ethics of the Mount Graham, Large Binocular Telescope Project

Submitted by: Rosalyn W. Berne, Division of Technology, Culture and Communication, University of Virginia, 351 McCormick Road, Thornton Road, Charlottesville, Va. 22904. 434-924-6098. rwb@virginia.edu And, Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University, Electrical Engineering Department, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton Florida, 33431. 561-297-2773. ravivd@fau.edu

Abstract

Case analysis is a common method for teaching engineering ethics. In this process, students are presented with the details of an engineering ethics problem, which was faced by particular individuals in a given situation while working for a particular organization. Students read the details of the case, and then use that case as the basis for discussion about how the ethical dimensions of the case might be addressed. With the use of particular classical approaches such as principalism and stakeholder analysis, students are given a theoretical framework for analysis of the case, as a way to find answers to the question, “What ought to be done?” Active discussion about the details of the case usually brings to light some of the complex questions of duty, responsibility, maximizing benefits and minimizing harm, which are common features of ethical dilemmas in the professions of modern engineering.

This paper introduces the Eight Dimensional Methodology for Innovative Thinking (the Eight Dimensional Methodology), for innovative problem solving, as a unified approach to case analysis that builds on comprehensive problem solving knowledge from industry, business, marketing, math, science, engineering, technology, arts, and daily life. It is designed to stimulate innovation by quickly generating unique “out of the box” unexpected and high quality solutions. It gives new insights and thinking strategies to solve everyday problems faced in the workplace, by helping decision makers to see otherwise obscure alternatives and solutions.

Dr. Daniel Raviv, the engineer who developed the Eight Dimensional Methodology, and paper co-author, technology ethicist Dr. Rosalyn Berne, suggest that this tool can be especially useful in identifying solutions and alternatives for particular problems of engineering, and for the ethical challenges which arise with them. First, the Eight Dimensional Methodology helps to elucidate how what may appear to be a basic engineering problem, also has ethical dimensions. In addition, it offers to the engineer a methodology for penetrating and seeing new dimensions of those problems.

Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education 1

Raviv, D., & Berne, R. (2003, June), Eight Dimensional Methodology For Innovative Thinking And The Case Of The Mount Graham Large Binocular Telescope Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. https://peer.asee.org/11745

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2003 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015