Nashville, Tennessee
June 22, 2003
June 22, 2003
June 25, 2003
2153-5965
10
8.483.1 - 8.483.10
10.18260/1-2--11584
https://peer.asee.org/11584
701
Session 3554
Enabling Student Innovation By Leveraging Lessons From Industry
J. M. Feland III and S. Carter
Stanford University / Doblin, Inc.
INTRODUCTION
Now that Engineering Entrepreneurship (E2) programs are emerging in universities all over the world, the E2 Community’s focus can be shifted from why teach E2 to what should we teach and how should we teach it? Current programs teem with courses on business models, marketing, accounting, etc. In some ways they resemble mini-MBA’s, designed to bootstrap engineers and scientists up the knowledge level necessary to take their product from concept to market. The underlying assumption to building all these skills is that the students have an innovative product to bring to market. Few engineering curriculums teach students to innovate. There is a continuum from science to business. Entrepreneurship programs focus on the business cycles over the technology cycles, assuming students understand the development of technology from their own domain experience. Innovation Fence Innovation Fence Innovation Fence Innovation Fence
Moore’s Chasm Moore’s Chasm
Innova- Early Early Late Laggards tors Adopters Majority Majority
Artistic & Paradigms/ Scientific & Mass Media Educational Visionary Macrohistory Technical Coverage & Historical Works Literature Materials
Exhibit 1: Geoffrey Moore’s Technology Adoption Life Cycle1 and the Wildman’s bibliographic cycle of technological innovations2 with the Innovation Fence included. The Innovation Fence is the hurdle a technology must cross before it finds its way into a product. Engineers help technology over this fence and into products. “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”
Carter, S., & Feland, J. (2003, June), Enabling Student Innovation By Leveraging Lessons From Industry Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. 10.18260/1-2--11584
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2003 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015