Columbus, Ohio
June 24, 2017
June 24, 2017
June 28, 2017
Educational Research and Methods
Diversity
15
10.18260/1-2--28244
https://peer.asee.org/28244
617
Emily Liptow is an AmeriCorps VISTA member at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. She is involved with a variety of diversity and inclusion efforts in the College of Engineering ranging from student support programs, faculty bias awareness trainings, and inclusive cultural change. She is a recent Industrial and Systems Engineering graduate from Ohio State University, where she was also very involved with social justice initiatives.
Michelle Bardini is a fourth year English major, Gender, Race, Culture, Science, and Technology minor at California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo. She served as an AmeriCorps CSU STEM VISTA summer associate and currently is a research assistant, teaching assistant, and lab manager for Advancing Cultural Change. She is involved in social justice initiatives, specifically researching epistemic bias, its connection to neoliberalism, and its production of gendered and socioeconomic inequalities.
Noah Krigel is a second year Sociology major at California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo. He is a Resident Advisor for University Housing’s Gender Inclusive building and is a research assistant for Advancing Cultural Change. He researches cultural differences between different majors on campus, especially in regards to racial, gender, and sexuality.
Monica Singer is a fourth year Psychology major, minoring in Child Development and Gender, Race, Culture, Science and Technology at California Polytechnic State University. She is currently a research assistant for Advancing Cultural Change. Her research interests include how stereotype threat and implicit bias functions in an academic setting (specifically in the STEM fields).
Professor Coleen Carrigan is a feminist anthropologist and an Assistant Professor of Science, Technology and Society (STS) at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. She investigates the historical and cultural dimensions of underrepresented groups' participation in science, technology and engineering and the reasons why white males still dominate these fields.
In this Research Paper, we describe Advancing Cultural Change (ACC), an action-oriented research initiative that engages undergraduates in ethnographic research to explore university culture and the lived experiences of its community members. Despite continued efforts to broaden participation in engineering programs across the country, there remains significant underrepresentation of racial minorities and women in these fields. This lack of diversity within engineering is due, in part, to exclusionary behaviors, such as bias and discrimination, that pervade the cultures of engineering. Drawing on critical theories including intersectionality, cultural capital, and critical methodologies in anthropology, ACC is aimed at making the experiences of underrepresented groups visible while strategizing collectively on ways to reduce cultural biases and to foster a more inclusive campus, specifically in engineering fields. We present preliminary data from a novel method developed during ACC research. The method, called Articulating a Succinct Description, uses ethnographic data to create case study interventions facilitated with undergraduate students to disseminate research findings; address problems presented in the case; and collect more data for further analysis. Emerging findings show how bias and discrimination shape the culture of engineering and how discussions around these incidents vary depending on the demographic makeup of the facilitation groups (race, gender, and major field of study). Preliminary analysis of data raises two critical questions: (1) how do students engage differently with case studies about racial and gender bias in homogenous and diverse group settings? and (2) how can the Articulating a Succinct Description method promote allyship and cultural change within engineering? We suggest that this innovative qualitative method, which serves both as a means of intervention and a means of inquiry, can provide underrepresented engineering students opportunities for their voices to be heard and to gain support from their peers. Further, it engages majority (white, male) students in efforts to create more inclusive cultures in engineering.
Liptow, E. E., & Bardini, M. H., & Krigel, N. R., & Singer, M. L., & Carrigan, C. (2017, June), Engaging Engineers in Inclusive Cultural Change Through a New Method, Articulating a Succinct Description Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28244
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015