Asee peer logo

Engineering Concept Assessment: Design and Development

Download Paper |

Conference

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

San Antonio, Texas

Publication Date

June 10, 2012

Start Date

June 10, 2012

End Date

June 13, 2012

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Standards and K-12 Engineering

Tagged Division

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Page Count

11

Page Numbers

25.539.1 - 25.539.11

DOI

10.18260/1-2--21297

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/21297

Download Count

73

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Jenny Daugherty Purdue University, West Lafayette

visit author page

Jenny Daugherty is an Assistant Professor in the Technology Leadership & Innovation Department at Purdue University.

visit author page

author page

Rodney L. Custer Black Hills State University

author page

Debra Brockway Stevens Institute of Technology

biography

Daniel A. Spake Purdue University

visit author page

Daniel A. Spake is a master's student in the Organizational, Leadership & Supervision Department in the College of Technology at Purdue University. He received his B.S. in technology education from North Carolina State University.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Engineering Concept Assessment: Design & DevelopmentThis “work in progress” paper documents the design, development, and testing of an instrumentthat captures teacher’s understandings of engineering and science concepts. This work stemsfrom an NSF-funded project that is investigating the viability of a concept-driven approach toteacher professional development. Research is being conducted to understand how scienceteachers learn engineering concepts and the issues and problems encountered duringimplementation. The Engineering Concept Assessment (ECA) provides a mechanism forassessing the extent to which the professional development experiences impact teachers’understanding of engineering concepts.Several studies have indicated that both science and engineering have a conceptual basis that areimportant for student learning. This is especially noted in the 2011 National Research Council’sreport “A Framework for K-12 Science Education,” which identified several cross-cuttingscience and engineering concepts. In terms of assessment, while some K-12 engineering-orientedinstrumentation exists, most are targeted at the elementary level and focus on a generalawareness of what engineers do. The ECA can be used to measure the extent to which teachersand students understand core engineering knowledge appropriate for secondary level engineeringeducation and their relationship to science content.The ECA expands upon an instrument that was designed to document understandings of threecore engineering concepts (constraints, optimization, and predictive analysis), which was pilotedwith teachers and used in a study with students to document their learning gains before and aftera concept-driven lesson. A group of experts in pre-college engineering education, scienceeducation, cognitive science, and assessment, as well as science and technology teachers,collaborated on the design of the ECA instrument building from this smaller version. In additionto the multiple choice formatted items, the instrument contains engineering design scenario itemsdesigned to assess the complex relationships among individual concepts. This paper describesthe design of the ECA, the validation processes, and pilot test data from a group of science andtechnology teachers.

Daugherty, J., & Custer, R. L., & Brockway, D., & Spake, D. A. (2012, June), Engineering Concept Assessment: Design and Development Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--21297

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2012 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015