June 14, 2009
June 14, 2009
June 17, 2009
Design in Engineering Education
14.546.1 - 14.546.12
Engineering Case Study Implementation: Observations, Results and Perspectives
Waterloo Cases in Design Engineering (WCDE) at the University of Waterloo (UW) is a new program to enhance design education through the development and implementation of design cases from student co-op work term and capstone project reports.
This paper summarizes the results of an implementation of the same engineering design case given to three separate engineering classes during the same academic term. The engineering design case was written from a student capstone design project report, and was developed to highlight the engineering design process. The case was developed as a so called interrupted case, where the case was delivered in modules, reflecting steps in the design process. A teaching note was provided to each instructor and served as a recommended guideline for implementation.
The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and General Motors of Canada Limited (GMCL) support a program to enhance engineering design education at the University of Waterloo. Waterloo Cases in Design Engineering (WCDE) has been established to develop, implement and promote the use of engineering design cases across the Faculty of Engineering curriculum.
The unique feature of the WCDE program is that cases are developed from students’ own work term reports. The University of Waterloo is a co-operative engineering school where students are required to gain practical experience between each academic term. Over 4000 work term reports are generated and submitted for academic credit each year. In addition, students are required to complete a final year engineering design project, to earn an accredited engineering degree. Both represent sustainable sources of engineering design experience for the development of design cases that can be developed and published for future educational use at UW or at other educational institutions.1
Cases have been used extensively and successfully in business, law, medicine and engineering to capture real situations and experiences and to deliver this knowledge into a classroom setting2. Proper implementation of cases in the form of the case method has been known to foster active learning through group and classroom discussion. Intercommunication between students and between instructor and student promotes enhanced problem finding and solving abilities, and can increase course effectiveness beyond that obtained by more traditional methods3. Cases also force students to use all four of Kolb’s learning styles, including concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization and active experimentation, whereas traditional methods only emphasize the last two styles4.
Assessing the effectiveness of the case method in our own curriculum, with our own students and faculty would provide important information and insight we could use to continuously improve
Nespoli, O., & Owen, W., & Campbell, C., & Lambert, S. (2009, June), Engineering Design Case Implementation: Observations, Results, And Perspectives Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--4952
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2009 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015