Salt Lake City, Utah
June 23, 2018
June 23, 2018
July 27, 2018
Educational Research and Methods
23
10.18260/1-2--30407
https://peer.asee.org/30407
1034
Mr. Christopher Rennick received his B.A.Sc., Honours Electrical Engineering in 2007 and his M.A.Sc. in Electrical Engineering in 2009, both from the University of Windsor, in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Chris is currently a PhD student in Management Sciences at the University of Waterloo.
Since 2010, he has been employed with the University of Waterloo, in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada as teaching staff.
Dr. Carol Hulls, P.Eng. is a Continuing Lecturer in the Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering Department at the University of Waterloo. She has been teaching courses in programming and digital logic since 1999. Always looking to improve classroom learning, she has tried a variety of techniques including Tablet teaching, flipped classrooms, and experiential learning. She received her BASc, MASc, and PhD from the University of Waterloo in Electrical and Computer Engineering. In 2016 she received the Brightspace Innovation Award in Teaching and Learning.
Derek is a full-time faculty member in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Waterloo. He runs the department's Graduate Attributes program to meet the CEAB accreditation requirements. He also researches in the areas of digital ICs, medical imaging physics, and modeling and simulation of microfluidics. He has a business background and is interested in productization and commercialization efforts related to his research and to student initiatives.
Eugene Li finished his M.A.Sc in Electrical Enginnering from the University of Waterloo in the field of Nonlinear Control Systems. Eugene's background is in the field of robotics and is currently a Lab Instructor for the Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering in support of the Mechatronics Engineering program
Dr. Sanjeev Bedi is the Director of the Engineering Ideas Clinic. He earned his PhD from the University of Victoria in 1987. As a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Waterloo, his research focus is machining, and he is well known for developing innovative 5-axis tool-positioning and flank-milling techniques.
This paper describes an evidence-based practice of using a hackathon model to address student learning outcomes in first year Engineering programs. There is a growing body of work around the use of hackathons to promote engagement, innovation, teamwork, and problem-solving in engineers before, during, and after their undergraduate studies. Existing hackathons tend to be open, extra-curricular events with a focus on software design and UX/UI design. While some hackathons have a theme to steer students towards a problem space defined by the organizers, there is an absence of literature regarding the use of hackathons in-class to support course-level learning objectives. This paper describes one model for an in-class, curricular hackathon which has (of this writing) been deployed in four different undergraduate programs (Computer, Electrical, Mechanical, and Mechatronics Engineering) on five separate occasions, with another two upcoming offerings. This model, which we have named Engineering Design Days, has been implemented in slightly different ways to engage the various cohorts of students and investigate best practices for student engagement. In general, each instance is two days with no traditional classes, labs, or tutorials, where the students work in teams to design and build solutions to open-ended problems. These problems are designed to integrate knowledge from across multiple courses in which the students are enrolled. The implementations described in this paper had students solve design problems by building physical systems using off-the-shelf components. The solutions were presented and tested in front of their peers at the end of the second day. Students and course instructors from each implementation described in this paper provided feedback through surveys, focus groups, and interviews. The results so far have been overwhelmingly positive from both students and instructors, with the adoption of this concept expanding across the Faculty of Engineering. Within this paper, lessons-learned will be discussed (including from an early iteration of this idea), as will strategies for ensuring the sustainability of Engineering Design Days moving forward.
Rennick, C., & Hulls, C., & Wright, D., & Milne, A. J. B., & Li, E., & Bedi, S. (2018, June), Engineering Design Days: Engaging Students with Authentic Problem-Solving in an Academic Hackathon Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--30407
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015