Salt Lake City, Utah
June 23, 2018
June 23, 2018
July 27, 2018
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Human-centered design methods and design thinking are increasingly promoted beyond the traditional creative design disciplines. These approaches are touted as tools for enhanced creativity that help align technical problem solving with actual human capabilities and experiences and result in more innovative outcomes. Engineering education, in particular, has been impacted by the rise in use of design approaches, largely for the better. However, design tools often exist in tension with mainstream approaches to conveying engineering knowledge to students, based as they are in the pursuit of “rigorous” quantified, universalized solutions. This paper explores some of the promises of design pedagogies for innovating engineering education as well as how these same approaches can contradict mainstay engineering educational assumptions and pedagogical frameworks. The paper concludes by reflecting on the extent to which engineering and design approaches are incommensurable and where opportunities exist for meeting in the middle.
Nieusma, D. (2018, June), Engineering/Design Frictions: Exploring Competing Knowledge Systems via Efforts to Integrate Design Principles into Engineering Education Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30420
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015