Asee peer logo

Engineering Graphics: The Fate Of Pencil, Paper, And The 2 D Drawing

Download Paper |

Conference

2005 Annual Conference

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 12, 2005

Start Date

June 12, 2005

End Date

June 15, 2005

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Assessment of Graphics Programs

Page Count

10

Page Numbers

10.551.1 - 10.551.10

DOI

10.18260/1-2--14759

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/14759

Download Count

282

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Gregory Watkins

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Engineering Graphics: The Fate of Pencil, Paper, and the 2-D Drawing

Gregory K. Watkins

William States Lee College of Engineering The University of North Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223

Abstract

The Engineering Technology (ET) department at UNC Charlotte began offering the first two years of its BSET curriculum in the fall semester 2004, having previously been exclusively a “two plus two” program. Although much of the first two years includes basic studies outside the department, a major portion of the new curriculum delivered by the department is the study of engineering graphics.

Developing the new curriculum from scratch allowed a fresh examination of engineering graphics education in the context of today’s computer driven society. One advantage was avoiding the “we’ve always done it this way” mantra. An additional advantage was the opportunity to examine today’s computer based drawing, modeling, and design tools, and to plan a curriculum around them, rather than integrating them into an existing course sequence.

Significant thought and planning went into the effort, and included input from several sources. Major decisions were made on several key issues such as: Should any work be done with manual instruments on the board? Is hand sketching an appropriate topic? Should some level of hand work (board or sketching) precede work on the computer? Should 2-D drawing practices, such as orthographic views and dimensioning, be stressed? Should the focus now be on design and parametric modeling rather than traditional 2-D drawing?

This paper details the issues faced in developing an engineering graphics course sequence for today’s engineering technology students. It examines the current role, if any, of board drafting and hand sketching. It includes discussion of the merits of studying 2-D drawing techniques, and how 2-D drawings dovetail with 3-D models. Parametric modeling is also discussed, including its role in the design process.

Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education

Watkins, G. (2005, June), Engineering Graphics: The Fate Of Pencil, Paper, And The 2 D Drawing Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--14759

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2005 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015