Baltimore , Maryland
June 25, 2023
June 25, 2023
June 28, 2023
Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD) and Engineering Management Division (EMD)
11
10.18260/1-2--43327
https://peer.asee.org/43327
248
John R. Donald is a professor at the University of Guelph with over 25 years of leadership experience in post-secondary education and engineering consulting. John is a past president (2017–18) and fellow (2020) of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA-ACÉG), and founder of the Guelph Engineering Leadership Program. His current research focuses on engineering leadership and development of professional skills in the engineering design curriculum.
Marnie V. Jamieson, PhD, MSc, P.Eng. is a Teaching Professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta. She is currently the Magee Chair in Chemical Engineering Design.
The world needs engineering graduates that can develop solutions that extend beyond the purely technical aspects of solving a challenge or problem. Engineering leadership education provides a strong mechanism for engineering educators to develop an engineering mindset that embraces the development of a depth and breadth of non-technical skills as being a key element of engineering education. This can lead to engineering graduates that are comfortable working across disciplines and contribute broadly to creating positive solutions to large and complex sociotechnical challenges. Notwithstanding, developing and integrating non-technical skills associated with leadership, such as social intelligence, developing vision and working in interdisciplinary teams beyond engineering is a systemic challenge. In this paper, the authors propose that a major barrier to systemic change toward enhanced non-technical skill development is the existing culture in the engineering education institutional environment. This paper is based on our personal experience in both advocating and implementing a broader mindset in the engineering curriculum. We begin by exploring the tensions in the culture of engineering education through the lens of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. We then follow with a discussion of the co-contraries that exist in engineering education within the bounds of these cultural dimensions. We conclude with thoughts on how concepts of engineering leadership could be leveraged to influence culture change that can positively influence the curricular aspects of engineering programs, as well as within the institutional environment. The work in this paper provides a baseline for discussion on how engineering educators can work to bridge the culture gap that arises from the systemic cultural tensions.
Donald,, J. R., & Jamieson, M. V. (2023, June), Engineering Leadership: Bridging the Culture Gap in Engineering Education Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43327
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015