June 15, 2014
June 15, 2014
June 18, 2014
Community Engagement Division
24.501.1 - 24.501.14
Engineering Pathways Study: Lessons Learned in Its Development and ImplementationAbstractThe Engineering Pathways Study focused on measuring how desired attributes of futureengineers are impacted by a student’s involvement in service or community engagement (CE)efforts and how these attributes develop over the time of a students’ undergraduate education.The three-year project consists of a sequential, but staggered, study of engineering students;primarily from four institutions. Cohorts were developed based on students’ level ofinvolvement in curricular and extracurricular service-based activities; i.e., ranked from none tohigh. The project has used various quantitative and qualitative instruments to explore theimpacts of CE on engineering students’ learning; specifically, traditionally technical attributes(e.g., ABET Criteria 3a-e) as well as a mix of non-technical attributes (e.g. global awareness,social context of problems, self-efficacy, identity, civic development, intercultural sensitivity,and psychosocial well-being). The two major components of the study consisted of semi-annualrounds of administering an on-line survey (for all participants) and telephone interviews(conducted with a sub-set of participants). An additional instrument to measure interculturalsensitivity was administered to the interview sub-set on an annual basis. Overall, the projecthad an initial, total participant number of over 250 (120 interviewed), but attrition lead to only200 continuing their participation throughout the three years.This paper focuses on the insights or ‘lessons learned’ during the study’s development andimplementation, with a focus on how to maintain participation rates. Specifically, insightsdiscussed in this paper include methods in 1) recruitment and retention of student participants, 2)compensation of participants, and 3) maintaining participant interests in each round of the study.Other insights discussed include maintaining consistency in the survey and interview instrumentswhile also allowing changes in the items used. The longitudinal nature of the project also forcedthe project team to address continuing participation of students who changed majors fromengineering or who had graduated and did not provide post-graduation contact information.Recommendations for future longitudinal studies are also provided.
Swan, C., & Paterson, K., & Hellickson, T. H. (2014, June), Engineering Pathways Study: Lessons Learned in Its Development and Implementation Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--20392
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2014 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015