Virtual On line
June 22, 2020
June 22, 2020
June 26, 2021
NSF Grantees Poster Session
22
10.18260/1-2--34565
https://peer.asee.org/34565
455
Andrew Olewnik is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Director of Experiential Learning for the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.
Randy Yerrick is Professor of Science Education and Associate Dean of the Graduate School of Education. He is an expert on the teaching of Science-Technology-Engineering-Mathematics (STEM), a Professor of Science Education, and an Associate Dean for the University at Buffalo. His research focuses on the development of scientific discourse among k-12 students in a context of perpetual STEM reform. He conducts sociocultural research to examine learning in science classrooms, with a particular emphasis on engaging students with histories of academic failure. He also researches teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding Science-Technology-Engineering-Mathematics (STEM) innovations and their impact on the youth of today. His research has demonstrated that transformative and culturally relevant pedagogy along with mobile technology, live data collection, and citizen science approaches can engage marginalized students for improved STEM expertise. Among other projects, he has investigated how engineers in higher education can improve their pedagogy for better retention of under-represented minorities of STEM. An internationally recognized expert in instructional technology, Yerrick received the SUNY UB Innovation Award, the Journal of Research in Science Teaching Best Paper Award, and Honorable Mention for the Wickenden Award for the Journal of Engineering Education.
Postdoctoral Associate in the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at University at Buffalo
Programs across the country encourage and facilitate experiential learning through a variety of mechanisms that help students transition from theory to practice. For such experiences to be truly meaningful to professional formation, students must also be capable of internalizing and effectively communicating insights from these experiences later. We conjecture that providing an engineering problem typology and reflection framework as context for student experiences will improve students’ ability to internalize and communicate the professional relevance of those experiences.
In this NSF PFE:RIEF sponsored research project we are using mixed-methods to collect pre / post data on students’ engineering epistemological beliefs, written reflections that consider the professional aspects of engineering projects, mock interviews, and group problem-solving discussions. Between the pre / post data collection, an intervention that takes form in a professionally relevant project experience (engineering intramural) with accompanying intermediate reflection sessions wherein students are introduced to engineering problem typology and specific professional competencies.
In this work-in-progress research poster, we present findings from analysis of the pre / post problem-solving discussions. This analysis is toward answering one of the motivating research questions: To what degree does the introduction of a problem typology impact students’ ability to meaningfully reflect on their experiences? Of particular interest is to analyze for changes across pre / post problem solving discussions and possible correlated changes in other pre / post data.
Olewnik, A., & Yerrick, R. K., & Madabhushi, M., & Ramaswamy, R. R., & Lee, Y., & Alfadhli, H., & Simmons, A. A. (2020, June), Engineering Undergrads Effectively Communicate Their Experience Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--34565
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2020 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015