California Polytechnic University, California
April 10, 2025
April 10, 2025
April 12, 2025
Diversity
15
10.18260/1-2--55173
https://peer.asee.org/55173
9
Tiffany Chan is a 4th-year undergraduate student in biomedical engineering at UC Davis and the recipient of the 2024 ASEE-PSW Section Undergraduate Student Award. She actively contributes to the cube3 Lab, where her interests lie in community building and inclusive practices. Tiffany is involved in various DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) research initiatives within the lab, including organizing student-faculty lunches and participating in the gender equity first-year seminar program. Additionally, she serves as the chair of the undergraduate subcommittee for the department's Health, Equity, and Wellness committee and holds the position of president in the BMES student chapter at UC Davis.
Saahil Sachdeva is a 4th-year undergraduate student in biomedical engineering at UC Davis. After completing his role as the 2024 Peer Mentor for the BME at the Health Campus program, he is now guiding the students to integrate their clinical immersion experience into their upcoming capstone projects. Saahil is also actively involved in research, including the development of a bone marrow microphysiological system under Dr. Steven George at UC Davis and an innovative infrared image processing algorithm to quantify inflammation under Dr. Adam Schiffenbauer at NIEHS.
Dr. Xianglong Wang is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in Biomedical Engineering (BME) at the University of California, Davis, and the program coordinator of the BME Quarter at Aggie Square clinical immersion program. Dr. Wang leads the cube3 lab, an engineering educational lab focused on community building and pedagogical innovations in BME. As a steering committee member, he helps shape the educational programs offered by the Center of Neuroengineering and Medicine at UC Davis. Before joining UC Davis, he was a career-track Assistant Professor at Washington State University (WSU). Dr. Wang is the recipient of the 2024 ASEE-PSW Section Outstanding Early Career Teaching Award, 2023 UC Davis Biomedical Engineering Excellence in Teaching Award, and 2022 WSU Reid Miller Teaching Excellence Award.
Long thought to benefit biomedical engineering students, clinical immersion programs around the U.S. have been enjoying a boom over the past five years. However, the actual implementation of the program greatly varies depending on the student body and the curriculum design. Therefore, the best practices for implementing these clinical immersion experiences are rare, especially the ones that can provide immediate benefits to the students. Our clinical immersion program is a 10-week immersive experience for third-year undergraduate students at the teaching hospital of our medical center. The highlight of our clinical immersion program is a weekly 3-hour session to observe surgical procedures. Even with a relatively small yearly cohort size of 12, post-COVID capacity restrictions pose significant challenges for the clinical immersion instructors. Observing students are required to be split into many operating rooms, leaving many students performing clinical observation without an expert in medical device design. These challenges can significantly limit the participating students’ learning effectiveness. In this paper, we propose a highly translatable peer-mentoring model to support students’ learning experiences during clinical observation sessions. In this pilot year of the peer-mentoring program, we hired a current fourth-year undergraduate student, who was part of the clinical immersion cohort in the previous year, as a peer mentor for the current cohort. The peer mentor assisted the instructors in managing the schedule for students to observe in the ORs prior to the observation sessions, went around the ORs to check in on each student during the observation sessions, and provided debriefing to the students and instructors after the observation sessions. In addition, the peer mentor generated resources for the students to prepare for the potential observation topics and clinical speakers’ seminars, as well as held weekly workshops to promote the formalization of potentially identified clinical needs and providing spark for potentially translating the found clinical needs into entrepreneurial or senior design projects. The assessments were primarily qualitative interviews focusing on students’ interactions and satisfaction with the peer mentor, while supported by quantitative course evaluations and attendance records for the workshops. We performed one interview with the peer-mentor and four interviews from the cohort of the students this year to learn more about the efficacy of this program. We transcribed and analyzed these interviews for recurring themes relevant to the interactions between the peer mentor and the students. The qualitative analysis was performed in NVIVO 15. Our project has been exempted by our IRB office (IRB 2267358-1). Our review of the interviews, surveys, and attendance records indicated the implementation of a peer mentor had positive impacts for the learning outcomes of our clinical immersion program. From the summaries of the midterm evaluation, the students widely regarded the speaker resources as valuable and appreciated the peer mentor’s presence in clinical immersion sessions, but many did not attend the workshops due to scheduling conflicts, which averaged about two students per workshop. The interviews highlighted the profound respect and appreciation the students had for the peer mentor. Students regarded the peer mentor as an accessible expert in the program that could advise and assist in the learning experience, particularly in the final project at the end of the course. Students perceived the peer mentor as a bridge between the students and clinical participants, making communication less intimidating and the process of clinical needs finding more accessible. The peer mentor reflected the importance of accommodating the needs of each student to ensure a productive experience for all members of the cohort. Future directions for our investigation in the peer mentor program include refining the scheduling of the workshops for increased accessibility for students and better tailoring the content towards the design process for medical devices. We would also like to further investigate the effects of student demographics on the peer-mentoring outcomes.
Chan, T. M., & Sachdeva, S., & Wang, X. (2025, April), Enhancing Clinical Immersion Experience with Peer-Mentoring Support Paper presented at 2025 ASEE PSW Conference, California Polytechnic University, California. 10.18260/1-2--55173
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015