Asee peer logo

Enhancing Engineering Education With Writing To Learn And Cooperative Learning: Experiences From A Software Engineering Course

Download Paper |

Conference

2002 Annual Conference

Location

Montreal, Canada

Publication Date

June 16, 2002

Start Date

June 16, 2002

End Date

June 19, 2002

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Current Issues in Computing

Page Count

14

Page Numbers

7.506.1 - 7.506.14

DOI

10.18260/1-2--10646

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/10646

Download Count

397

Paper Authors

author page

Lonnie Welch

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Main Menu

Session 2558

Enhancing Engineering Education with Writing-to-learn and Cooperative Learning: Experiences from a Software Engineering Course

Lonnie R. Welch, Sherrie Gradin, and Karin Sandell Ohio University Athens, OH 45701 welch/gradin/sandell@ohio.edu

1. Introduction

Current progressive teaching movements draw forth strong skepticism as they often seem antithetical to engineering classes. Why would anyone want to switch from the lecture method of teaching engineering to methods that employ active learning? Doesn’t lecturing produce the most informed engineers? Isn’t lecturing the best way to challenge students? To uphold the highest standards? Many hold the view that active learning methods may be appropriate for “soft” disciplines, but are inappropriate for engineering and the sciences. Others argue that students won’t take the course work seriously and that coverage of material would have to be sacrificed. The presenters will question the validity of these objections by defining learning goals, such as depth of learning, engagement, and retention, that should be considered during selection of teaching methods.

It will be shown that teaching writing-to-learn and cooperative learning achieve these goals and result in extraordinary transformation of both teacher and students. Student engagement and excitement are elevated at the same time as the depth of learning increases. Students become better engineers because they can think critically, solve problems individually or in teams, write better, and orally present information. Teachers find themselves challenging students with an even more demanding curriculum. Examples from a software engineering course will illustrate how these methods can challenge students more, create higher standards for learning, and produce better engineers than a typical lecture approach to teaching.

2. Organization and Goals of the Software Engineering Course

This paper describes how cooperative learning and writing-to-learn have been employed in Software Design (course CS 456 13 in the School of EECS at Ohio University). The purpose of the course is to provide students with skills needed in the software engineering profession. While they have completed numerous courses requiring development of software (students take C S 456 in their senior year), they typically lack several important perspectives. They have focused

“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”

Main Menu

Welch, L. (2002, June), Enhancing Engineering Education With Writing To Learn And Cooperative Learning: Experiences From A Software Engineering Course Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2--10646

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015