DeJong, B. P., & Langenderfer, J. (2012, June), Enrollment and Persistence of First-year Students in a Newly Accredited Engineering Program  Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--21335

\bibitem{asee_peer_21335}
  DeJong, B. P., \& Langenderfer, J. (2012, June), \emph{Enrollment and Persistence of First-year Students in a Newly Accredited Engineering Program}
  Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, San Antonio, Texas.
  10.18260/1-2--21335

Brian P. DeJong and Joseph Langenderfer.  "Enrollment and Persistence of First-year Students in a Newly Accredited Engineering Program".  2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 2012, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2012.  https://peer.asee.org/21335 Internet.  14 Dec, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_21335}
  Brian P. DeJong and Joseph Langenderfer.
  "Enrollment and Persistence of First-year Students in a Newly Accredited Engineering Program".
  \emph{2012 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 2012, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2012.
  https://peer.asee.org/21335 Internet.  14 Dec, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_21335
author = "Brian P. DeJong and Joseph Langenderfer"
title = "Enrollment and Persistence of First-year Students in a Newly Accredited Engineering Program"
booktitle = "2012 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2012"
month = "June"
address = "San Antonio, Texas"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/21335}
number = {10.18260/1-2--21335}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  -            First-Year Engineering Students in Newly Accredited Programs:                      Enrollment and Persistence DemographicsThis paper examines enrollment and persistence trends among first-year students in recentlyaccredited electrical (EE) and mechanical (ME) engineering programs at a predominantlyundergraduate-oriented, non-research intensive, historically Liberal Arts university where theprograms grew from an existing technology department. Until now, the programs have relied ona convenience sample of students with minimal program promotion or recruitment.Transcript information and surveys of students enrolled in an introductory (first-year)engineering course were collected during the first six years of the programs. Transcript dataincludes: semesters of enrollment and graduation, grades in math courses taken before andduring the first-year course, first-year course grade and current grade-point-average (GPA).Surveys given at the beginning of every semester asked students to rank their top three intendedmajors. Questions asked in surveys at semester completion included previous intended major,ranking of new top three intended majors, reason for the intended major changed. Distributionsof student interest and math preparedness upon enrollment in the introductory course wereanalyzed. Additionally, within-program and university persistence was quantified and comparedto math level and earned first-year course grade.Enrollment increases in the first-year course average 7%. One half and one quarter of thestudents plan to major in ME and EE, respectively, while one quarter plan on a different major.The GPAs and first-year course grades have stayed relatively constant.The academic plan for engineering students recommends taking Calculus I before or during thefirst-year course; students with MathLevels of Calculus or Post-Calculus are deemed “OnTrack”,others are deemed “Behind”. Currently, 48% of the students are OnTrack, and 15% are ahead inmath. For the Behind math students, persistence is poor, but for OnTrack students, persistence isacceptable. Additionally, per year, the number of students at each level is growing, but thedistribution is shifting towards Behind at a rate of 1.4%. This trend is problematic becausedoubling the number of On-Track students would require tripling first-year course enrollment.Results of this study may be informative for universities with new or under-developmentengineering programs. Results imply a need for concerted efforts at recruiting students who arewell prepared for success in engineering programs. Emphasis should be on attractingmathematically strong students to an introductory course, rather than on retaining morecurrently-enrolled freshman students.One way to improve the quality would be to add a precalculus pre-/co-requisite for the first-yearcourse. Doing so may reduce the first-year course enrollment significantly (<5%). Another step to improve qualitythat the School has already implemented is admission requirements with respect to GPA andcourse-specific grades. This step will further reduce the persistence of first-year course students,but presumably affects Behind students more than OnTrack students. The exact outcome ofthese strategies remains to be seen.
AU  - Brian P. DeJong
AU  - Joseph Langenderfer
CY  - San Antonio, Texas
DA  - 2012/06/10
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Enrollment and Persistence of First-year Students in a Newly Accredited Engineering Program
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/21335
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--21335
ER  -