June 15, 2014
June 15, 2014
June 18, 2014
24.537.1 - 24.537.12
Ethical Climate in Multidisciplinary Teams: Development of the TECSSince the ABET call for a greater emphasis on engineering ethics education, researchers andteaching professionals have incorporated applied ethics into the curriculum (Frey, Sanchez, &Cruz, 2002). However, most of the work on applied ethics has focused on individual leveldevelopment (Colby & Sullivan, 2008). Little attention has been paid to how students thinkabout ethics and make decisions at a team level. Additionally, creating assessments for teamethics has presented a significant challenge. The present research project has been developed toenhance the research on multidisciplinary team ethics and advance the measurement and utilityof team ethics in the classroom to prepare engineering students for the real world. This paper isa progress report on a collaborative effort of team-based project programs at four universitiesfunded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under a Transforming UndergraduateEducation in Science (TUES) Phase 2 grant.One way to look empirically evaluate team ethics is through ethical climate, a type of workclimate that consists of the shared attitudes toward ethical behaviors and considerations. Ethicalclimate is influenced by organizational level policies, managerial support, and practices (Cullen& Martin, 2006). Research has identified five types of ethical climate that reoccur acrossstudies: personal benefit, caring, independence, rules, and laws and codes (May & Gandara,2010; Lemmergaard & Lauridsen, 2008; Martin & Cullen, 2006). Employees can use multipleethical climates in decision making. Measures of ethical climate emphasize that certain climatetypes are relevant in different contexts (i.e. ethical problem occurs internally in the team, theissue relates to laws; Victor & Cullen, 1988).The researchers have adapted the concept of ethical climate and brought it to multidisciplinarystudent teams. Teams on longer projects often face ethical problems, and the researchersdeveloped a tool to address some of the unique considerations for ethics in multidisciplinaryteams. Researchers developed the Team Ethical Climate Survey (TECS) to measure studentteam ethical climate. This instrument was adapted in part from the Ethical ClimateQuestionnaire (ECQ; Victor & Cullen, 1987), including the team interest, laws and codes,personal morality, rules and procedures, and self-interest scales. Authors also included care,interdisciplinary professional ethics, and shared decision-making scales.The paper will discuss the development of the TECS scale for multidisciplinary teams. Morespecifically, it will focus on an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) conducted on TECS data inorder to determine if the developed test scales emerged as factors with the student data. The datawas collected for 521 undergraduate students involved with long-term (semester length orlonger) multidisciplinary team projects. The TECS was administered at the midpoint of thesemester. Results indicated that five factors emerged: team interest (alpha=.91), self-interest(alpha=.79), personal morality (alpha=.55), discussion of issues (alpha=.74), and differences invalues (alpha=.71). The authors will discuss future developments for the TECS and its use inthe classroom. Additional findings and insights of interest will be explored, and implications forengineering faculty and professionals will be provided.
May, J. L., & Mead, A., & Ellington, J. K. (2014, June), Ethical Climate in Multidisciplinary Teams: Development of the TECS Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--20428
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2014 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015