Vancouver, BC
June 26, 2011
June 26, 2011
June 29, 2011
2153-5965
Curriculum Innovations in Architectural Engineering Education
Architectural
8
22.643.1 - 22.643.8
10.18260/1-2--17924
https://peer.asee.org/17924
10980
Gouranga Banik, Ph.D., P.E.
Gouranga Banik is a Professor of Construction Management Department at Southern Polytechnic State University in Marietta, Georgia. Dr. Banik completed his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Iowa State University. He has eleven years working experience in both private and public sector as an engineer and/or construction manager. He is a registered professional engineer. Dr. Banik has more than fourty refereed publications in the area of civil engineering and construction management. He presented some of his research in several well-known and peer reviewed conferences like ASEE, ASCE, ASC, WEFTEC and CIB, and published articles in those conference
proceedings. He presented his research all over the world including the United States, Canada, Greece, Italy, Brazil,
and the Philippines.
Cheating among Undergraduate StudentsStudent dishonesty, a prevalent and perennial phenomenon, has been a challenging issue for allacademia. Research has shown that dishonesty in academic environment, cheating in particular,is a predictor of unethical behavior in subsequent professional settings. Students’ attitudestoward cheating and whether they would report instances of cheating they witnessed wereexamined in this study. A total of 218 students participated in the study. Findings suggest thatstudents perceived cheating behaviors involving exam-related situations to be serious, whereasplagiarism was rated as less serious. Cheating in the form of not contributing one’s fair share in agroup project was also perceived as a serious form of academic misconduct, although a majorityof the students admitted having engaged in such behavior. With regard to the prevalence ofacademic cheating, this finding suggests that students are morally ambivalent about academiccheating and are rather tolerant of dishonesty among their peers. On the issue of whethercheating behaviors should be reported, this study revealed that a majority of students chose totake the expedient measure of ignoring the problem rather than to blow the whistle on their peers.Implications of the findings are also discussed in this article.
Banik, G. (2011, June), Ethics: Why is it Important and How can we Teach it for Engineering and Construction Students? Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--17924
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2011 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015