Paper Authors

Abstract

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

to learn from experience. Hence the most competent individuals will become better evaluators while less competent individuals learn more slowly.

The authors acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation through award NSF0530588. James Duvall would like to acknowledge support from a National Science Foundation REU award (NSF0631565) which enabled him to develop the peer evaluation software used in this study. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Bibliography

1. "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs," (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore, MD, 2004). 2. S. Howe, and J. Wilbarger, "2005 NATIONAL SURVEY OF ENGINEERING CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSES," in ASEE Annual Meeting, (Chicago, 2006). 3. D. C. Davis, S. W. Beyerlein, and I. T. Davis, "Development and Use of an Engineer Profile," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, (Portland, 2005). 4. M. Prince, "Does Active Learning Work? A review of the research," J. Eng. Educ. 93, 223-246 (2004). 5. K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, "Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom- Based Practices," J. Eng. Educ. 94, 87-101 (2005). 6. D. Carr, Herman, K. Zarotney, Miller, and A. Wakefield, The Team Learning Assistant Workbook (McGraw Hill, Boston, 2005). 7. K. A. Smith, Teamwork and Project Management (McGraw Hill, Boston, 2007). 8. J. McGoutry, and K. DeMeuse, The Team Developer: An Assessment and Skill Building Program (J. Wiley & Co., New York, 2000). 9. D. B. Kaufman, R. M. Felder, and H. Fuller, "Accounting for Individual Effort in Cooperatire Learning Teams," Journal of Engineering Education 89, 133-140 (2000). 10. S. G. Adams, "Building Successful Student Teams in the Engineering Classroom," Journal of STEM Education 4, 27-32 (2003). 11. K. L. Tonso, "Teams that Work: Campus Culture, Engineer Identity, and Social Interactions," J. Eng. Educ. 95, 25-37 (2006). 12. M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, M. L. Loughry, and A. G. Yuhasz, "Effects of Behavior Anchors on Peer Evaluation Reliability," Journal of Engineering Education 94, 319-326 (2005). 13. J. Duvall, and A. Cheville, "Web-Based Configurable Peer Evaluation System," (2007). 14. J. Kruger, and D. Dunning, "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77, 1121-1134 (1999). 15. M. Lejk, and M. Wyvill, "The Effect of the Inclusion of Self-assessment with Peer Assessment of Contributions to a Group Project: A Quantitative Study of Secret and Agreed Assessments," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26, 551-561 (2001). 16. R. M. Ford, and C. S. Coulston, Design for Electrical and Computer Engineers (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2007). 17. N. M. Webb, and A. S. Palincsar, "Group Processes in the Classroom," in Handbook of Educational Psychology, D. C. Berliner, and R. C. Calfee, eds. (Simon and Schuster MacMillan, New York, 1996). 18. P. R. Pintrich, "A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts," Journal of Educational Psychology 95, 667-686 (2003). 19. K. Wentzel, "What is it that I'm trying to achieve? Classroom goals from a content perspective.," Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 105-115 (2000). 20. A. Cheville, C. Co, and B. Turner, "Improving team performance in a capstone design course using the jigsaw technique and electronic peer evaluation," in ASEE Ann. Conf. and Exhib., (Honolulu, 2007). 21. L. K. Michaelsen, "Team Learning: A Comprehensive Approach to Harnessing the Power of Small Groups in Higher Education," To Improve the Academy 11, 5-54 (1992).

• Citation

• Format
  • APA
  • APA - LaTeX bibitem
  • MLA
  • MLA - LaTeX bibitem
  • Bibtex
  • EndNote - RIS

Cheville, A., & Duvall, J. (2008, June), Evaluating Different Aspects Of Peer Interaction Using An On Line Instrument Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3558