Montreal, Quebec, Canada
June 22, 2025
June 22, 2025
August 15, 2025
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session - Case Studies
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
18
10.18260/1-2--56447
https://peer.asee.org/56447
3
Mary Kay Camarillo is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific in Stockton. She specializes in environmental engineering. Her research focuses on water and wastewater treatment as well as on the environmental impacts of energy production. She teaches classes on environmental engineering, ethics, and construction management.
Luke Lee is Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific, where he teaches courses in structural mechanics and structural design and conducts research in infrastructure renewal, structural health monitoring, and durability of composite
While generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has the potential to enhance learning through better access to information, it also challenges many of our traditional educational methods. The emergence of GenAI has left educators grappling with the need to adapt while also finding ways to integrate GenAI skills, critical thinking, and ethical awareness into their courses. In this study we investigated the use of GenAI to generate information on engineering ethics case studies and integrate GenAI into a course. First, we examined whether GenAI could produce comprehensive case studies as compared with the case studies from our course textbook. We then introduced review of GenAI-generated case studies into an engineering and computer science ethics course to emphasize critical thinking and awareness of GenAI issues. We found that GenAI was effective in producing basic information about well-known case studies but lacked the technical detail, ethical analysis, and professional judgment that was evident in the textbook case studies. When prompted, GenAI could provide information on environmental and societal concerns that were lacking in the textbook. In reviewing the GenAI-generated case studies, students reported increased confidence in their ability to recognize GenAI text and judge it for bias based on pre- and post-assignment surveys. While continued integration of GenAI into coursework is essential for developing graduates who can critically evaluate GenAI and use it effectively, the textbook remains a valuable resource for the course. Future steps include new assessments to better address the myriad of ethical issues introduced by GenAI.
Camarillo, M. K., & Lee, L. S., & Garcia Ruiz, Y. (2025, June), Evaluating engineering ethics case studies: Can generative AI replace the textbook? Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . 10.18260/1-2--56447
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015