Baltimore , Maryland
June 25, 2023
June 25, 2023
June 28, 2023
Committee on Educational Policy Presents: Pillars of Professional Development
Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)
15
10.18260/1-2--43430
https://peer.asee.org/43430
191
Professor
Associate Chair, Department of Engineering and Engineering Technology
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated an expedited adaptation of engineering higher education programs to remote teaching and learning. However, little is understood about attitudes towards such remote teaching initiatives, including its perceived advantages and disadvantages and its effect on the ability to acquire knowledge and succeed academically, ability to adapt to changing or complex circumstances, and quality of student-to-student interactions, among other things. Many engineering students continue to work while receiving their degrees, revealing emerging student needs related to remote learning, such as by reducing or eliminating commute time to campus and its associated environmental impact and financial costs. Using a survey design, a study was conducted to evaluate students’ experiences with and perceptions of the remote-synchronous course delivery method during the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple programs, including engineering and architecture, at two universities, one in the US and one in the EU. This paper provides an assessment of a selection of these experiences and perceptions by program type, program level, and institution. A non-parametric statistical analysis is conducted with ordinal variables using SPSS-based data analysis. At the institutional level, some variation in learning experiences for MSU Denver and University of Pécs students is found. While the results suggest no significant differences in students’ level of motivation or the perception of remote labs as being successfully conducted between the MSU Denver and the University of Pécs, the students at University of Pécs did generally place greater importance of student-to-student interactions for positive learning outcomes than MSU Denver students. At the program level, aggregating both institutions, no significant differences between undergraduate and graduate students’ experiences were found for any of the measured outcomes. The findings provide evidence-based recommendations for departments considering different course delivery methods. The results suggest that student perception can be improved by increasing the effectiveness of remote laboratories and by providing opportunities for student-to-student interactions in the remote learning environment. These recommendations seek to increase the resilience of engineering education by enhancing its preparedness for natural disasters, pandemics, energy crises, wars, or other unexpected circumstances.
Balogh, Z., & Mangné Kardos, Z., & Juhasz, T. (2023, June), Evaluating Students’ Attitudes Towards Synchronous Remote Course Delivery: An Analysis of Engineering Programs during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US and EU Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43430
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015