Asee peer logo

Evaluation Of Learning Styles And Instructional Technologies

Download Paper |


2000 Annual Conference


St. Louis, Missouri

Publication Date

June 18, 2000

Start Date

June 18, 2000

End Date

June 21, 2000



Page Count


Page Numbers

5.286.1 - 5.286.6



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Virginia Elkins

author page

Roy Eckart

author page

Catherine Rafter

author page

Ali Houshmand

author page

Eugene E. Rutz

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 2793

Evaluation of Learning Styles and Instructional Technologies Eugene Rutz, Virginia Elkins, Catherine Rafter, Ali Houshmand, Roy Eckart University of Cincinnati


The paper describes the initial efforts of a project to evaluate the impact of various instructional technologies on student learning, and to determine if there is a correlation between learning styles of individual students and the efficacy of specific instructional technologies. The project will use basic engineering science courses (Engineering Mechanics and Basic Strength of Materials) as a platform for evaluating the technologies and their impact on learning. Both courses include multiple sections with rather large student populations. The project is being conducted in the College of Engineering at the University of Cincinnati, in cooperation with Wright State University, with support from the GE Fund.

I. Introduction

Basic engineering science courses are the foundation of an engineering education in that students begin to learn how to apply basic science concepts to engineering problems. The knowledge and problem solving skills the students gain is a crucial step in their engineering education and ultimately their professional expertise. As critical as these courses are, they are rarely taught by the most accomplished teaching faculty, and at some colleges are regularly assigned to graduate teaching assistants. This project will re-engage instructors recognized for their teaching skills in the preparation and presentation of basic curriculum material and in its delivery, using technologies that hold the promise of enhancing student learning.

There is a prevalent assumption that computer-aided instruction can improve student learning by accommodating students’ learning styles. However, little practical research has been reported on the learning styles of engineering students or the evaluation of instructional technology that is effective for a particular learning style. This project seeks to fill the gap by providing an assessment of learning styles of engineering students and the impact of various instructional technologies on student learning. By the end of the study, we will be able to determine whether or not there is a correlation between a student’s learning style and his/her response to a particular instructional technology.

II. Project Description

The GE Fund will support a three-year project that seeks to improve student learning in basic engineering science courses. The goal of the project is to optimize student learning through use of educational technologies that are commonly used. The basic steps in the project are:

• Train faculty in educational technologies and project goals • Assess student learning styles

Elkins, V., & Eckart, R., & Rafter, C., & Houshmand, A., & Rutz, E. E. (2000, June), Evaluation Of Learning Styles And Instructional Technologies Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 10.18260/1-2--8366

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2000 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015