Asee peer logo

Evaluation Of Tele Tutorial Support In A Remote Programming Laboratory

Download Paper |

Conference

2004 Annual Conference

Location

Salt Lake City, Utah

Publication Date

June 20, 2004

Start Date

June 20, 2004

End Date

June 23, 2004

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Virtual and Distance Experimentation

Page Count

13

Page Numbers

9.584.1 - 9.584.13

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/13115

Download Count

500

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Klaus Rütters

author page

Bernardo Wagner

author page

Andreas Böhne

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 2426

Evaluation of Tele-tutorial Support in a Remote Programming Laboratory

Andreas Böhne, Klaus Rütters, Bernardo Wagner

Learning Lab Lower Saxony (L3S), Hanover, Germany {boehne, ruetters, wagner}@learninglab.de

Abstract

Laboratories allow students to apply their theoretical knowledge in a situated context. Many students only work and learn successfully in such a complex laboratory setting when they get instructional support from a human tutor. This support is provided by a local tutor in classical local laboratories. To provide such support in a remote lab as well, we developed a web based lab environment, which supports synchronous tele-tutorial assistance by a human tutor. To evaluate synchronous tele-tutorial support we conducted a controlled experiment with 19 electrical engineering students. The students worked in groups of two or three on a remote programming experiment, while a tutor assisted them with the synchronous communication tools video conference, text chat and desktop sharing. Regarding this lab setting, our research questions were: Has synchronous tele-tutorial support the potential to provide a high quality of instructional support? Which communication media are most useful for such a lab setting? Does self-directed as opposed to teacher-directed learning lead to better task successes and student motivation? Therefore, all student groups were remotely assisted by a human tutor and either exposed to a self-directed or a teacher-directed setting. We measured students’ initial knowledge, use of the different communication media, consulting effort, contentedness with tele-tutorial support and students’ motivation, and analyzed task success. The results of our study show that the students were content with the remote tele-tutorial support. Students rated audio chat and desktop sharing as most useful and video picture of the tutor and text chat as less important. Contrary to our expectations there was no statistically significant difference between the motivation and the task success of students working in the self-directed setting and students working in the teacher-directed setting.

Introduction

A major goal in engineering education is that students acquire problem solving and creativity strategies so that they become able to construct technical systems. Such strategies can be learned by working on small problems and construction assignments in a problem-based learning environment. Laboratories are a typical example of a problem based learning setting. They allow applying and testing theoretical knowledge in practical learning situations, in which students

Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education

Rütters, K., & Wagner, B., & Böhne, A. (2004, June), Evaluation Of Tele Tutorial Support In A Remote Programming Laboratory Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/13115

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2004 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015