Examining Gender Differences in Engineering Students’ Reflections on Combating Systemic Racism

Sakhi Aggrawal; Aparajita Jaiswal; Gaurav Nanda; Saloni Parkar

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Publication Date: February 9, 2025
Start Date: February 9, 2025
End Date: February 11, 2025
Conference Session: CANCELLED: Track 4: Technical Session 2: Examining Gender Differences in Engineering Students' Reflections on Combating Systemic Racism
Tagged Topics: Diversity and 2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions
Page Count: 14
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/54086
Download Count: 4

Paper Authors

biography

Sakhi Aggrawal Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) orcid.org/0000-0002-2274-0152

visit author page

Sakhi Aggrawal is a Graduate Research Fellow in Computer and Information Technology department at Purdue University. She completed her master’s degree in Business Analytics from Imperial College London and bachelor’s degree in Computer and Information Technology and Organizational Leadership from Purdue University. She worked in industry for several years with her latest jobs being as project manager at Google and Microsoft. Her current research focuses on integrating project management processes in undergraduate education. Her main goal is to understand how work management and product development practices widely used in industry can be modified and adapted to streamline undergraduate STEM education.

visit author page

biography

Aparajita Jaiswal Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

visit author page

Aparajita Jaiswal is an Intercultural Research Specialist at the Center for Intercultural Learning, Mentoring, Assessment and Research (CILMAR), Purdue University. She completed her Ph.D. in 2022 from the Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University. Her research interest lies at the intersection of Intercultural learning, Sociology of learning, Human-computer interaction, and STEM Education.

visit author page

biography

Gaurav Nanda Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) orcid.org/0000-0003-1240-8639

visit author page

Dr. Gaurav Nanda is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Technology at Purdue University. His research focuses on machine learning and natural language processing applications for data analytics and decision support in areas of safety, education, healthcare, and supply chain. He completed his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering and postdoc in Engineering Education from Purdue University. He earned his Masters and Bachelors degrees from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur, India and worked in the software industry for five years before moving to academia.

visit author page

author page

Saloni Parkar

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Background: Systemic racism is deeply embedded in various institutions and societal structures, perpetuating inequalities and shaping interpersonal interactions. Engineers play a crucial role in addressing and dismantling these systemic issues as they influence shaping the built environment and technological systems that impact diverse communities. Therefore, integrating social justice principles and awareness of systemic inequities into the engineering curriculum is crucial for preparing future engineers to create inclusive and equitable solutions. By examining how engineering students reflect on their roles in combating systemic racism, we can gain insights into their preparedness to engage with these critical issues as professionals and identify areas where educational interventions can be most effective.

Purpose: This study aims to explore how undergraduate engineering students of different genders reflect on their roles in combating systemic racism, comparing and contrasting their perspectives and proposed strategies. By understanding these gender differences, we can develop more targeted and effective approaches to integrate social justice education into engineering curricula and foster a more inclusive generation of engineers.

Methods: The study was conducted with 19 engineering technology students enrolled in a junior-level undergraduate Human Factors course. As part of the course, students completed a 90-minute online module introducing the principles of social justice and the realities of hostile design in urban planning and reflected on how they plan to combat systemic racism in their own lives, workplaces, and communities. These written reflections were analyzed qualitatively, coding for common themes and noteworthy differences across genders. Gender Schema Theory was applied as an analytical framework to interpret the findings.

Results: The analysis revealed both similarities and differences in how male and female engineering students reflected on their roles in combating systemic racism. Both genders emphasized the importance of education, self-reflection, and advocacy. However, male respondents often focused on individual-level actions and personal interactions, while female respondents tended to emphasize structured strategies, policy advocacy, and leadership roles. Male students frequently acknowledged their limited exposure to diversity and privileged backgrounds, whereas female students did not explicitly discuss personal experiences. Female respondents often provided more specific strategies for combating systemic racism, while male responses sometimes lacked specificity and expressed uncertainty about the best approaches.

Implications: These findings emphasize the importance of integrating educational practices that acknowledge and address gender differences in processing and responding to issues of systemic racism. Engineering educators should consider these insights when engaging students in anti-racism efforts, providing targeted support and guidance to different gender groups. Educational interventions could benefit from incorporating elements that challenge existing gender schemas—encouraging male students to engage more deeply with systemic analyses and supporting female students in discussing personal experiences and backgrounds. Ultimately, fostering a united front against systemic racism requires leveraging the diverse strengths and perspectives of all genders while also acknowledging the unique challenges and experiences that shape their engagement with this critical issue.

Keywords: Gender differences, engineering education, systemic racism, social justice, gender schema theory, intersectionality, diversity and inclusion

Citation
Format

Aggrawal, S., & Jaiswal, A., & Nanda, G., & Parkar, S. (2025, February), Examining Gender Differences in Engineering Students’ Reflections on Combating Systemic Racism Paper presented at 2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD), San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/54086

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Background: Systemic racism is deeply embedded in various institutions and societal structures, perpetuating inequalities and shaping interpersonal interactions. Engineers play a crucial role in addressing and dismantling these systemic issues as they influence shaping the built environment and technological systems that impact diverse communities. Therefore, integrating social justice principles and awareness of systemic inequities into the engineering curriculum is crucial for preparing future engineers to create inclusive and equitable solutions. By examining how engineering students reflect on their roles in combating systemic racism, we can gain insights into their preparedness to engage with these critical issues as professionals and identify areas where educational interventions can be most effective.

Purpose: This study aims to explore how undergraduate engineering students of different genders reflect on their roles in combating systemic racism, comparing and contrasting their perspectives and proposed strategies. By understanding these gender differences, we can develop more targeted and effective approaches to integrate social justice education into engineering curricula and foster a more inclusive generation of engineers.

Methods: The study was conducted with 19 engineering technology students enrolled in a junior-level undergraduate Human Factors course. As part of the course, students completed a 90-minute online module introducing the principles of social justice and the realities of hostile design in urban planning and reflected on how they plan to combat systemic racism in their own lives, workplaces, and communities. These written reflections were analyzed qualitatively, coding for common themes and noteworthy differences across genders. Gender Schema Theory was applied as an analytical framework to interpret the findings.

Results: The analysis revealed both similarities and differences in how male and female engineering students reflected on their roles in combating systemic racism. Both genders emphasized the importance of education, self-reflection, and advocacy. However, male respondents often focused on individual-level actions and personal interactions, while female respondents tended to emphasize structured strategies, policy advocacy, and leadership roles. Male students frequently acknowledged their limited exposure to diversity and privileged backgrounds, whereas female students did not explicitly discuss personal experiences. Female respondents often provided more specific strategies for combating systemic racism, while male responses sometimes lacked specificity and expressed uncertainty about the best approaches.

Implications: These findings emphasize the importance of integrating educational practices that acknowledge and address gender differences in processing and responding to issues of systemic racism. Engineering educators should consider these insights when engaging students in anti-racism efforts, providing targeted support and guidance to different gender groups. Educational interventions could benefit from incorporating elements that challenge existing gender schemas—encouraging male students to engage more deeply with systemic analyses and supporting female students in discussing personal experiences and backgrounds. Ultimately, fostering a united front against systemic racism requires leveraging the diverse strengths and perspectives of all genders while also acknowledging the unique challenges and experiences that shape their engagement with this critical issue.

Keywords: Gender differences, engineering education, systemic racism, social justice, gender schema theory, intersectionality, diversity and inclusion

AU  - Sakhi Aggrawal
AU  - Aparajita Jaiswal
AU  - Gaurav Nanda
AU  - Saloni Parkar
CY  - San Antonio, Texas
DA  - 2025/02/09
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Examining Gender Differences in Engineering Students’ Reflections on Combating Systemic Racism
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/54086
ER  -