Reeping, D., & Edwards, C. D. (2020, June), Exemplars of Integration in Engineering Education’s Use of Mixed Methods Research  Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--34623

\bibitem{asee_peer_34623}
  Reeping, D., \& Edwards, C. D. (2020, June), \emph{Exemplars of Integration in Engineering Education’s Use of Mixed Methods Research}
  Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line .
  10.18260/1-2--34623

David Reeping and Cherie D. Edwards.  "Exemplars of Integration in Engineering Education’s Use of Mixed Methods Research".  2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line , 2020, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2020.  https://peer.asee.org/34623 Internet.  12 Dec, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_34623}
  David Reeping and Cherie D. Edwards.
  "Exemplars of Integration in Engineering Education’s Use of Mixed Methods Research".
  \emph{2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line , 2020, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2020.
  https://peer.asee.org/34623 Internet.  12 Dec, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_34623
author = "David Reeping and Cherie D. Edwards"
title = "Exemplars of Integration in Engineering Education’s Use of Mixed Methods Research"
booktitle = "2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access"
year = "2020"
month = "June"
address = "Virtual On line "
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/34623}
number = {10.18260/1-2--34623}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - This theory paper explores ways in which the engineering education community can achieve more comprehensive integration in mixed methods designs. We searched for exemplars in the Journal of Engineering Education, the European Journal of Engineering Education, and the Australasian Journal of Engineering Education using “mixed-method” and “mixed methods” as keywords – resulting in 60 viable articles. Using Creamer’s Mixed Methods Evaluation Rubric (MMER), we found exemplar articles demonstrating considerable proficiency across one or more of the rubric’s four criteria: (1) amount of mixing, (2) interpretive comprehensiveness, (3) transparency and (4) methodological foundation. Using the exemplars as discussion points, we advocate for: (1) the use of mixing during analysis to increase the interplay between the different strands of inquiry (amount of mixing), (2) framing results using the study’s constructs, research questions, or perspectives to avoid siloing the study’s approaches (interpretive comprehensiveness), (3) using methods flowcharts to communicate design features (transparency), and (4) drawing from a more extensive body of methodological literature to justify design decisions (methodological foundation).
AU  - David Reeping
AU  - Cherie D. Edwards
CY  - Virtual On line 
DA  - 2020/06/22
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Exemplars of Integration in Engineering Education’s Use of Mixed Methods Research
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/34623
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--34623
ER  -