Exploding Stereotypes: Care and Collaboration in the STEM Sciences

Catherine A Broom; Wendy Lynn Klassen; Carolyn Labun, Ph.D.

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Vancouver, BC
Publication Date: June 26, 2011
Start Date: June 26, 2011
End Date: June 29, 2011
ISSN: 2153-5965
Conference Session: Broadening Participation of Minority Students in and with K-12 Engineering
Tagged Divisions: K-12 & Pre-College Engineering and Minorities in Engineering
Page Count: 11
Page Numbers: 22.685.1 - 22.685.11
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--17966
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/17966
Download Count: 416

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Catherine A Broom University of British Columbia, Okanagan

visit author page

Assistant Professor of Education

visit author page

biography

Wendy Lynn Klassen University of British Columbia, Okanagan

visit author page

Dr. Wendy Klassen has been teaching in the Faculty of Education at UBC, Okanagan for five years and at Okanagan University College for the six years previous to that. She teaches courses in Math Education, Instructional Strategies, Mentoring, and Assessment. The concept of praxis as it deals with pre-service mathematics education is a key focal research area. Others areas of interest and research are mentoring, assessment, problem solving, critical thinking, and gender differences in mathematics.

visit author page

biography

Carolyn Labun, Ph.D. University of British Columbia

visit author page

Carolyn Labun is a Senior Instructor in the School of Engineer at the Okanagan campus of the University of British Columbia.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Exploding Stereotypes: Care and Collaboration in the STEM SciencesIn this collaboration, two education professors and an engineering instructor explored whether 1)stereotypes about the engineering profession as non-caring and non-collaborative were held bymale and female upper elementary students; whether 2) male and female students had similar orvarying views, and 3) whether stereotypes (if present) could be broken through engineeringdesign activities that included elements of both care and community in classrooms. This paperwill present the findings of the study which used an interactive, classroom activity to address thethree guiding research questions. Engineering students from the researchers’ universityvolunteered in the classroom activity.Students in elementary and secondary schools often hold stereotypes of STEM sciences: theyview them as male-dominated, individualistic (Smith & Hung, 2008) and uncaring, and believethey marginalize women (Roychoudhury, Tippins & Nichols, 1995). These stereotypes arereinforced by mass media (Steinke, 2005) and by curricula and in class activities that don’tinclude girls’ preferred learning styles (Brotman & Moore, 2008), which centre aroundcollaboration and relationships (Brotman & Moore, 2007). Students hold views that scientists aremen (Shakeshaft, 1995), that males are better at STEM fields (Smith & Hung, 2008) and negativenotions of females in these fields (AAUW, 2010).As girls view STEM fields to not encompass collaboration, connection, and care (Baker andLeary, 1995), a significant number of girls choose not to go into them for careers (NSF, 2009).However, these conceptions are false as the STEM sciences, for example the field ofEngineering, in fact requires collaborative work which is embedded in the ethic of care. Care isunderstood as a necessary component of successful group work and therefore care is essential toeffective engineering design.The researchers conducted their study in two grade 6 classrooms as research evidence suggeststhat students develop their perceptions of various careers at an early age (Hartung, Porfeli, &Vondracek 2005). Students in the two classes were grouped; in the first class the groups weremade up of both genders while in the second class groups were girl-only and boy-only with theattempt to address “stereotype threat”—the underperformance of girls in the STEM sciences dueto their heightened fears of failure associated with stereotypes (Smith & Hung, 2008).The project began with the researchers conducting pre-assessments of students’ conceptions ofseveral professions, including that of engineers.Next, the researchers led the students in an interactive, engineering lesson that embeddedelements of both care and collaboration. This was made explicit to students through the mannerin which the lesson was both presented and modeled. The lesson required each student to have“expert knowledge” in one facet of a design collaboration, using each of the three principledivisions of engineering (civil, mechanical, and electrical) to create features of a global village.University engineering students assisted in order to ensure that the students were able tosuccessfully complete the project, and to model collaboration and care, while posing andanswering relevant questions.The researchers ended the lesson by eliciting from and discussing with the students how bothcollaboration and care are necessary for the engineering profession.The project concluded with a post-assessment that illustrated how students’ conceptions ofstereotypes had changed. We will share the findings of this intriguing study in this paperpresentation, as well as present our recommendations for breaking elementary school students’stereotypes of the engineering profession.

Citation
Format

Broom, C. A., & Klassen, W. L., & Ph.D., C. L. (2011, June), Exploding Stereotypes: Care and Collaboration in the STEM Sciences Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--17966

TY  - CPAPER
AB  -      Exploding Stereotypes: Care and Collaboration in the STEM SciencesIn this collaboration, two education professors and an engineering instructor explored whether 1)stereotypes about the engineering profession as non-caring and non-collaborative were held bymale and female upper elementary students; whether 2) male and female students had similar orvarying views, and 3) whether stereotypes (if present) could be broken through engineeringdesign activities that included elements of both care and community in classrooms. This paperwill present the findings of the study which used an interactive, classroom activity to address thethree guiding research questions. Engineering students from the researchers’ universityvolunteered in the classroom activity.Students in elementary and secondary schools often hold stereotypes of STEM sciences: theyview them as male-dominated, individualistic (Smith &amp; Hung, 2008) and uncaring, and believethey marginalize women (Roychoudhury, Tippins &amp; Nichols, 1995). These stereotypes arereinforced by mass media (Steinke, 2005) and by curricula and in class activities that don’tinclude girls’ preferred learning styles (Brotman &amp; Moore, 2008), which centre aroundcollaboration and relationships (Brotman &amp; Moore, 2007). Students hold views that scientists aremen (Shakeshaft, 1995), that males are better at STEM fields (Smith &amp; Hung, 2008) and negativenotions of females in these fields (AAUW, 2010).As girls view STEM fields to not encompass collaboration, connection, and care (Baker andLeary, 1995), a significant number of girls choose not to go into them for careers (NSF, 2009).However, these conceptions are false as the STEM sciences, for example the field ofEngineering, in fact requires collaborative work which is embedded in the ethic of care. Care isunderstood as a necessary component of successful group work and therefore care is essential toeffective engineering design.The researchers conducted their study in two grade 6 classrooms as research evidence suggeststhat students develop their perceptions of various careers at an early age (Hartung, Porfeli, &amp;Vondracek 2005). Students in the two classes were grouped; in the first class the groups weremade up of both genders while in the second class groups were girl-only and boy-only with theattempt to address “stereotype threat”—the underperformance of girls in the STEM sciences dueto their heightened fears of failure associated with stereotypes (Smith &amp; Hung, 2008).The project began with the researchers conducting pre-assessments of students’ conceptions ofseveral professions, including that of engineers.Next, the researchers led the students in an interactive, engineering lesson that embeddedelements of both care and collaboration. This was made explicit to students through the mannerin which the lesson was both presented and modeled. The lesson required each student to have“expert knowledge” in one facet of a design collaboration, using each of the three principledivisions of engineering (civil, mechanical, and electrical) to create features of a global village.University engineering students assisted in order to ensure that the students were able tosuccessfully complete the project, and to model collaboration and care, while posing andanswering relevant questions.The researchers ended the lesson by eliciting from and discussing with the students how bothcollaboration and care are necessary for the engineering profession.The project concluded with a post-assessment that illustrated how students’ conceptions ofstereotypes had changed. We will share the findings of this intriguing study in this paperpresentation, as well as present our recommendations for breaking elementary school students’stereotypes of the engineering profession.
AU  - Catherine A Broom
AU  - Wendy Lynn Klassen
AU  - Carolyn Labun, Ph.D.
CY  - Vancouver, BC
DA  - 2011/06/26
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Exploding Stereotypes: Care and Collaboration in the STEM Sciences
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/17966
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--17966
ER  -