Salt Lake City, Utah
June 23, 2018
June 23, 2018
July 27, 2018
This Complete Research paper will explore how engineering major choice relates to self-concept measured by a first-year survey. Choice of major is one of the most important decisions a new student can make in terms of their college experience. Major choice determines the type of work the student will be most engaged in, as well as the departmental culture they will experience, both of which have been shown to impact retention and success (Seymour & Hewitt, 1997, June 1). While Engineering is often treated as a unified field of study in relation to other disciplines such as math, science, and humanities, it is also useful to examine major choice within Engineering. Each engineering discipline has a unique disciplinary culture and work practices that may impact who chooses to enter. While a number of factors impact the choice of major before entering college (e.g. see Carnasciali, Thompson, & Thomas, 2013, June 23), we are interested in how that choice changes during a common first-year experience. This research is an important component in assessing the role a common first-year experience has in helping students find a good disciplinary fit. For example, if many students end up changing their mind about their major by the end of the first year this is evidence that a common first year is needed to help new students decide which engineering discipline aligns most with their own values and goals.
A number of identity and motivation constructs have been associated with retention and success within engineering: domain identification, utility, and perceived ability have all been associated with choosing to major in engineering, and academic success within engineering (Jones, Ruff, & Paretti, 2013, September 1; Matusovich, Streveler, & Miller, 2010). The aim of this study is to better understand how these constructs measured at the start of the first-year may relate to engineering major choice at the end of the year.
We explore these relationships by leveraging existing data collected through surveys administered to first-year engineering students. Surveys were administered at three points during students’ first-year in a common engineering program since 2014 and a total of 3796 students responding. From this data we develop a model using logistic regression relating engineering domain identification, utility, and perceived ability to the likelihood to change major choice. Finally, we discuss implications for further research and practice, specifically with regard to a common first-year engineering experience.
Kelly, S. L., & Maczka, D. K., & Grohs, J. R. (2018, June), Exploring Engineering Major Choice and Self-concept Through First-year Surveys Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--30487
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015