June 24, 2017
June 24, 2017
June 28, 2017
Continuing Professional Development
The school-to-work transition is a critical period for recent engineering graduates and can have significant impacts on graduates’ future decisions within the engineering discipline. As recent graduates engage in professional engineering practice for the first time, they acquire a wide range of knowledge regarding what to do, how to do it, and why it is done the way it is. Further, newcomers who have positive experiences during their organizational transitions tend to perform better and acclimate more effectively to their new environments than those who experience negative interactions. Thus, if we are committed to enhancing the competence and effectiveness of our engineering workforce, ensuring a successful school-to-work transition is an important element of such efforts. However, while learning during the school-to-work transition can influence many different aspects of one’s career, the ways in which this learning happens is largely underexplored. The purpose of this paper is to explore contexts for new learning and opportunities for transfer of undergraduate learning. To that end, we ask the following research question: How do recent engineering graduates describe salient learning experiences during the school-to-work transition?
To address this question, this study presents an analysis of data collected from a larger study exploring newcomer engineers’ learning during the school-to-work transition. Reflective journal prompts captured newcomers’ weekly experiences of self-reported salient learning events. Twelve participants answered 6 open-ended questions each week for 12 weeks that probed significant challenges, accomplishments, and learning opportunities as well as their relationship to prior undergraduate experiences. Findings point to two major conclusions regarding how learning takes place during the transition and the kinds of learning that appear to transfer across school and work contexts. First, learning experiences largely take place through unstructured, on-the-job activities that are often in response to the problems generated through the work itself. That is, while some structured training does take place within the initial transition, participants described their salient learning events as those occurring through informal interactions with coworkers and supervisors. Further, though engineering course material or technical knowledge were perceived as important during the transition, participants identified the structural similarities of previous experiences as the main facilitator of transfer of learning. Rather than focusing on course-specific content, participants drew from their broader experiences in the university (e.g., semester changes, approaches to studying, getting acquainted with teammates, moving into campus housing, etc.) when relating their learning to undergraduate experiences. Given these findings, we argue that while attention to engineering course content is necessary for effective teaching, engineering educators need to consider equally the contexts created to enable such learning.
Lutz, B. D., & Paretti, M. C. (2017, June), Exploring School-to-work Transitions through Reflective Journaling Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28332
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015