Exploring Student Engagement and Project Outcomes in Capstone Design: Insights from a Grounded Theory Study
- Conference
- Location
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Publication Date
-
June 22, 2025
- Start Date
-
June 22, 2025
- End Date
-
August 15, 2025
- Conference Session
-
ERM Technical Session: Developing Engineering Competencies II
- Tagged Division
-
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
- Page Count
-
7
- Permanent URL
-
https://peer.asee.org/56519
Paper Authors
Elliott Clement Oregon State University
Elliott Clement is a doctoral student at Oregon State University. His current research is using grounded theory to understand identity and motivation within the context of capstone design courses. He is also part of a research team investigating context-specific affordances and barriers faculty face when adopting evidence-based instructional practices in their engineering courses.
Shane A. Brown P.E.
Oregon State University
orcid.org/0000-0003-3669-8407
Shane Brown is an associate professor and Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in
James L. Huff
University of Georgia
orcid.org/0000-0002-6693-5808
Dr. James Huff is an Associate Professor within the Engineering Education Transformations Institute and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. He also serves as Deputy Editor with the Journal of Engineering Education and Chair of the Education Research and Methods Division in the American Society for Engineering Education. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University, his M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue, and his B.S. in Computer Engineering from Harding.
Dr. Huff is a qualitative researcher whose work lies at the interdisciplinary nexus of engineering education research and applied personality and social psychology. An NSF CAREER Awardee, he is committed to fostering care as a central mindset of engineering and other professions through his in-depth examinations of personal lived experiences of identity and emotion, facets often hidden within professional domains. As Principal Investigator of the Beyond Professional Identity lab, Dr. Huff has mentored undergraduates, doctoral students, and professionals from over fifteen disciplines in conducting their qualitative investigations on psychological phenomena relevant to equity and well-being in workplaces and degree programs.
Abstract
In this Empirical Research Brief, we present selected findings from a grounded theory study examining student engagement in design activities within an engineering capstone course.
Capstone courses, a staple in engineering programs, represent both the culmination of students’ academic journey and a step towards their professional careers. Engagement in these design activities is crucial for students to demonstrate their knowledge and practice key professional skills, however, little research has been done on students’ design activity engagement in the context of capstone courses. Understanding and improving student design activity engagement in capstone design could ultimately improve their readiness for the engineering profession.
We present insights from a broader grounded theory study, drawing on data from interviews with 31 students participating in capstone design courses. Our findings are derived from an in-depth analysis of these interviews.
Our analysis demonstrates a novel framework for understanding how students engage in capstone design courses. Specifically how feedback, processes and outcomes impact design activity engagement throughout a capstone project. In this paper, we focus on the influence of project outcomes on student engagement in design activities, and define three types of outcomes: perceived outcomes, adapted outcomes, and reflected outcomes. These definitions account for the evolving nature of outcomes in open-ended projects such as capstone designs, and reflect how students perceived, adapted to, and reflected upon project outcomes throughout their engagement in capstone.
These results offer valuable insights into student engagement in capstone design activities and could help make these courses more engaging, potentially improving students' readiness for the professional engineering world. Further research is required to expand these findings to different disciplines and to examine how professional engineers engage with design activities.
Clement, E., & Brown, S. A., & Huff, J. L. (2025, June), Exploring Student Engagement and Project Outcomes in Capstone Design: Insights from a Grounded Theory Study Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . https://peer.asee.org/56519
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015