Paper Authors

Abstract

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

consider additional parameters to specify media use in order to prevent a rush to use CAD at the various stages of the course. Lastly, consideration should be given to guest critics from engineering instructors at the structural exploration phase to provide additional insight and learning opportunities in order to enhance the studio experience.

1. Mitgang, L. “Back to School: Architects Sound Off on 10 Critical Issues Facing Architectural Education.” Architectural Record. September, 1999. 2. Karloff, R. How the Profession is Failing the Schools. Architecture 85 (1996). 3. Mitgang, L. Saving the Soul of Architectural Education. Architectural Record. May, 1997. 4. Bermudez, J. & King, R. Media Interaction and the Design Process: Establishing a Knowledge Base. Digital Design Studios: Do Computers Make a Difference? Proceedings from ACADIA 1998. 5. Leglise, M. “Art Under Constraint-Preserving the Creative Dimension in Computer Aided Design”, Language of Design, 3. (1995). 6. Marx, J. “A Proposal for Alternative Methods for Teaching Digital Design”, Automation In Construction, 9. (2000). 7. Laseau, P. “The Architectural Representation Handbook”, (2002). 8. Koutamanis, A. “Digital Architectural Visualization”, Automation in Construction, 9. (2000). 9. Chastain, T., Kalay, Y., & Peri, C. “Square Peg in a Round Hole or Horesless Carriage? Reflections on the Use of Computing in Architecture”, Automation in Construction, 11. (2002) 10. Johnson, S. “What’s in a Representation, Why Do We Care, and What does it Mean? Examining the Evidence from Psychology”, Automation in Construction, 8. (1998). 11. Madrazo, L. “Computers and Architectural Design: Going Beyond the Tool”, Published in Digital Design Studios: Do Computers Make a Difference?, ACADIA Conference Proceedings. (1998) 12. Kilkelly, M. “Off the Page: Object Oriented Construction Drawings”, Published in ACADIA 2000: Eternity, Infinity, and Virtuality, ACADIA Conference Proceedings. (2000). 13. Ethier, S. & Ethier, C. “Instant AutoCAD Architectural Desktop”, Prentice Hall. (2000). 14. Mondero, J. “Parametric Design: A Review and Some Experiences”, Automation in Construction, 9. (2000). 15. Little, P. & Cardenas, M “Use of ‘Studio’ Methods in the Introductory Engineering Design Curriculum”, Journal of Engineering Education 7. (2001) 16. Abdelmawla, S., Elnimeiri, M., & Krawczyck, R. “Structural Gizmos”, Published in the proceedings of the Association for Computer-Aided Design In Architecture 2000: Eternity, Infinity, and Virtuality. (2000).

STAN GUIDERA is an Assistant Professor in Architectural/Environmental Design Studies in the College of Technology at Bowling Green State University. He teaches design studios, advanced CAD courses and computer rendering and animation. He is a registered architect and has used computer-aided design extensively in professional practice.

“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”

• Citation

• Format
  • APA
  • APA - LaTeX bibitem
  • MLA
  • MLA - LaTeX bibitem
  • Bibtex
  • EndNote - RIS

Guidera, S. (2003, June), Exploring The Architecture Of Structure: Integrating Structures Into Design Studio Using Object Oriented Cad Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. 10.18260/1-2--11973