June 15, 2014
June 15, 2014
June 18, 2014
Educational Research and Methods
24.594.1 - 24.594.13
Faculty Approach to Working Life Issues (Research Paper)BackgroundWithin engineering education, the debate regarding to what extent students should beprepared for the future occupation has been present ever since the emergence in the 19thcentury. The controversy regards having a practice based orientation or having a moretheoretical focus (Jorgensen 2007). Several approaches such as CDIO have been initiated toput more emphasis on the skills students’ need to be able to work as engineers (Crawley et al2007). However, there are studies for instance from the university described in this paper, ahighly ranked technical university in Europe, as well as other studies (e.g. Walther et al 2011)pointing at the shortage of connections to the world of work.AimThe aim of the paper is to study the faculty’s approach to working life outside academia. Thepaper is a report from a study on faculty awareness of working life issues with the long-termgoal to identify ways of increasing the connection to working life in engineering education.The research questions are: Which attitudes do faculty members have to working life issues?Which activities related to working life are conducted by the faculty?MethodologyA mixed methods approach with a sequential design was conducted (Creswell 2009). Aquestionnaire was sent to the faculty, totally 1430 recipients. The response rate was 35%. Toexamine some questions in depth, we conducted case studies in three engineeringprogrammes, two with a large extent of connections to working life and one with less.Twelve interviews were conducted. The results of the questionnaire were analyzed in SPSSand NVivo was used to perform a thematic analysis of the interviews.FindingsThe results indicate that 57% of faculty members are interested or very interested in includingwork related issues in their teaching, while 11% have no or very little interest.The results also show that faculty members rate the following knowledge, competence andskills in the engineering profession as most important: critical thinking, problem solving andfinding new solutions. Business, leadership and entrepreneurship skills, on the other hand, arerated as less important.In the engineering program with less connection to working life, faculty members seem tohave few contacts, mainly in small businesses, and offer primarily guest lectures, while thosewith a large extent of connections seem to have more contacts with larger companies andoffer more integrated activities e.g. projects that originate from industry.Conclusions and significanceThe findings show ambivalence for faculty – on the one side they would like to integratework experiences but on the other side they find business and leadership less importantcompared to traditional academic values.The question of faculty members’ attitudes and activities related to working life is animportant factor in engineering education if we want to ensure that students are well preparedfor their professional career. This paper contributes to a more nuanced understanding of howto integrate contacts to working life in engineering education as well as for obstacles andopportunities involved.
Magnell, M. H., & Geschwind, L. A., & Gumaelius, L. B., & Kolmos, A. J. (2014, June), Faculty Approaches to Working Life Issues in Engineering Curricula Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--20485
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2014 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015