Milwaukee, Wisconsin
June 15, 1997
June 15, 1997
June 18, 1997
2153-5965
6
2.195.1 - 2.195.6
10.18260/1-2--6567
https://peer.asee.org/6567
498
Session 1253
Session 1253
Faculty Collaboration and Course Coordination with Feeder Campuses using Information Technologies
Dhushy Sathianathan, Carol Dwyer, Marsha King, Eric Spielvogel The Pennsylvania State University
ABSTRACT
With a growing emphasis on vertical and horizontal integration of engineering curriculum there is a growing need for strong coordination among the engineering courses. This coordination is necessary for accreditation specially in courses that satisfy design requirements. Four-year engineering institutions that receive a significant percentage of their graduates transferring from two-year institutions or community colleges have the enormous task of coordinating their curriculum across institutional boundaries.
This paper outlines a coordination and collaboration model that has been developed and implemented at the Pennsylvania State University. The model has been implemented on a first- year design course taught at 19 campuses in the Penn State system. The model involves developing a new course structure, identifying coordination team, identifying coordination mechanisms using appropriate technology, faculty development, and incentives to sustain long- term coordination.
A COURSE STRUCTURE FOR COORDINATION
Several of the colleges in the NSF sponsored Engineering Education Coalition have efforts 1,2 underway to redesign the first-year engineering course as a design course . This is also one of the missions of the ECSEL (Engineering Coalition of Schools for Excellence in Education and Leadership), where Penn State plays a leading role in developing a model for course coordination among multiple campuses.
The 19 campuses of Penn State provide access to 1800 engineering students per year. These students can take the first-year engineering course at any of the 19 locations. This presents a serious challenge in terms of ensuring consistency in course expectations, competencies, content, and types of learning experiences offered at the various locations.
The key to implementation of a course that successfully meets the course expectations at multiple campus locations is that the faculty teaching the course must have “ownership” of the course.
King, M., & Spielvogel, E., & Dwyer, C., & Sathianathan, D. (1997, June), Faculty Collaboration And Course Coordination With Feeder Campuses Using Information Technologies Paper presented at 1997 Annual Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 10.18260/1-2--6567
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 1997 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015