Asee peer logo

Faculty Friendly Assessment Systems For Biomedical Engineering Programs

Download Paper |


2007 Annual Conference & Exposition


Honolulu, Hawaii

Publication Date

June 24, 2007

Start Date

June 24, 2007

End Date

June 27, 2007



Conference Session

BME Assessment and the VaNTH ERC

Tagged Division


Page Count


Page Numbers

12.731.1 - 12.731.11



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Steven Schreiner Western New England College

author page

Judy Cezeaux Western New England College

author page

Diane Testa Western New England College

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Faculty-Friendly Assessment System for Biomedical Engineering Programs Abstract

Many engineering programs have limited resources to create and operate an assessment system. Paramount to the success of a system is the system’s ability to engage faculty without being an undue burden so that the faculty remains compliant and the system yields useful information. The assessment system design needs to ensure that: assessment data are collected consistently by the faculty, the faculty is involved in the analysis of these data, and any changes made in response to the data are implemented by the faculty.

At Western New England College, a program outcome assessment system has been designed to maximize faculty buy-in and participation by carefully defining the faculty interaction with the system. Most of the quantitative outcome data are delivered to the system from specific courses within the curriculum. The instructor of a course needs to be concerned with predefined outcome measures and deliver data to support that measure. This works well because instructors are centered on the day-to-day activity within their courses. This course-centered approach helps to measure outcomes consistently even when the course changes hands. Additionally, adjunct professors can easily provide data for assessment without the need for a broader interaction or understanding of the assessment system.

The data that are supplied to the system are ultimately analyzed by the faculty during specific, periodic departmental assessment meetings. The data that have been supplied to the system are inherently grouped and organized to facilitate meaningful discussion of outcomes, even though each outcome has several measures across the curriculum. This organization is designed into the system, needing only a small clerical effort to copy course data that has been provided by the faculty.

The system has been operating for three years and has recently generated data to support a formal ABET review that has led to an accredited status. The small size of our department and limited resource demand that the system provide a wealth of data without undue labor – this has been achieved.


The ABET process has many facets that require significant effort and resource. Enderle, et al. have compiled a comprehensive review of all the necessary elements for accreditation that include eight separate criteria that must be satisfied in order to achieve an accredited status1. In this paper we focus on meeting the requirements of Criteria 3 and 8 with a quality improvement system that measures and assesses program outcomes while documenting and tracking any necessary feedback. Meeting Criterion 3 is perhaps the most challenging aspect of achieving ABET accreditation because it requires a true continuous improvement process that engages the entire undergraduate faculty2.

Schreiner, S., & Cezeaux, J., & Testa, D. (2007, June), Faculty Friendly Assessment Systems For Biomedical Engineering Programs Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 10.18260/1-2--2041

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2007 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015