June 14, 2015
June 14, 2015
June 17, 2015
Engineering and Public Policy
26.766.1 - 26.766.10
Faculty Governance: A tradition or legal right? Impact on Engineering EducationAt many universities the traditional model of shared faculty governance is being challenged. The boardof trustees and the administration of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, one of the oldest engineeringschools in America recently suspended their faculty senate. At my university the State Board ofEducation suspended the faculty senate and authorized the President to implement an interim facultyadvisory structure. Many other universities have implemented less radical changes to their system offaculty governance.In many respects engineering has not been impacted to the same degree as some other disciplines bythe recent trend toward a more corporate model of university governance. For instance, bucking thetrend in higher education, engineering departments have yet to employ contingent faculty in significantnumbers. This may be why faculty in other disciplines have been more proactive in addressing concernsarising from this new corporate model. There are few papers addressing this important topic inengineering education literature.This paper will present the legal and political parameters that anyone involved in faculty governance anduniversity service should clearly understand. It will present a case study that involves a highly chargedpolitical controversy that extended beyond campus and into the federal courts. The university’s regionalaccrediting body was also drawn into the conflict and eventually the United States Department ofEducation became involved.This paper is not an advocacy paper or even an opinion paper it is an informational paper. It willpresent factual information and analysis that is applicable to other universities. It will attempt toquantify some the impacts and changes to engineering education that have resulted from a rapidtransition away from a campus culture of shared governance to a more corporate model.There are a number of upcoming events in the next three months at my university that could provideadditional insight and clarification of treatment of faculty governance by accrediting bodies. Myuniversity will undergo an accreditation visit by the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities(NWCCU) on October 20 -22. The Department of Education will meet in December to discussreaffirming NWCCU recognition as an accrediting body.
Ellis, M., & Wabrek, R. M. (2015, June), Faculty Governance: A Tradition or Legal Right? Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24103
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015