Asee peer logo

First-Year Engineering Students’ Experiences with a Course of Ethics and History of Technology

Download Paper |


2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition


Tampa, Florida

Publication Date

June 15, 2019

Start Date

June 15, 2019

End Date

June 19, 2019

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics in the First Year

Tagged Division

Engineering Ethics

Page Count




Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors


Gunter Bombaerts

visit author page

Gunter Bombaerts is Assistant Professor for Philosophy and Ethics of Technology at Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands. His research fields include ethics in engineering education (motivation, deep learning, competence measurement), comparative ethics and questions concerning applied ethics in the field of energy ethics, in particular on participation and innovation. He is coordinating the TU/e USE program and is teacher of USE courses (amongst which the USE basic course on History and Ethics of Technology).

visit author page


Karolina Doulougeri Eindhoven University of Technology

visit author page

Dr. Karolina Doulougeri is a post-doctoral research fellow in the Technological University of Eindhoven. Her research focuses on engineering students' motivation and deep learning strategies, coaching in design based learning and educational redesign of engineering courses. She received her PhD in Organizational Psychology from the University of Macedonia, in Greece. She has worked in several international research projects focusing on students and employees' well- being, professional development and performance. Her work has been published in peer reviewed journals and presented in several international conferences.

visit author page

Download Paper |


Introduction Several course aspects can affect students’ motivation and engagement with it. This study focuses on an 11-week course on ethics and history of technology (USE Base course), taught to 2000+ first-year engineering students. Previous evaluations of the USE Base course showed that students of Informatics and Applied Mathematics (INF/AM) and Biomedical Technology (BMT) reported low motivation and satisfaction with it. Our aim was to understand better the reasons behind students’ low motivation with the course and to implement educational changes to make it more relevant and interesting for them. Our research questions were: RQ1: Which aspects of the USE Base course do students of Informatics, Applied Mathematics (INF/AM) and Biomedical Technology (BMT) consider interesting? RQ2: Are there differences in students’ deep learning and motivation with the course, compared to 2017? Methods For the design our study, we used theories related to deep learning (Marton and Saljo, 1976), learning environment (Dochy et al., 2005) and Self-Determination Theory of motivation (Ryan and Deci, 2000). To answer the research questions, we used a mixed-method approach focusing on the two target groups of INF/AM and BMT. To answer the RQ1, we performed focus-group discussions with second-year students, who had already attended the course in 2017. In addition, we invited first-year students before the beginning of the new course to provide us with feedback about the new study material. During the course, we conducted observations and held focus group discussions after the end of the course. To answer RQ2, validated questionnaires on deep learning, learning environment and motivation were electronically administered to students after the history part, after ethics part and after the final exam. Their answers were compared to the students’ answers in 2017. Results The qualitative study revealed a link between students’ professional identity and the perceived relevance of the USE Base course. Students who saw ethics and knowledge of history as part of their professional identity as engineers, were more engaged and motivated during the course. An important factors affecting students’ motivation and deep learning was the perceived differences in educational approaches, (e.g. on how feedback was given, multidisciplinary groups) and the study material (e.g. long reading texts), between the USE Base course and the courses of their own departments. In terms of educational content, for all students’ clarity in the course assignment and organization of the study material was considered important. That was especially true for INF students, who needed much more structure on how the material was organized and presented. The quantitative results showed a significant increase in INF/TW students’ overall evaluation of the course, compared to the students in 2017; while the difference for students of BMT was not significant. More results of the quantitative study will be discussed. Conclusions The preliminary conclusions indicate that the interest of INF/TW and BMT students for the USE Base course is influenced by their way of looking at reality and their own professional identity. It also highlights the difficulties of general courses offered to students from different departments to establish a common ground in terms of educational approaches and be relevant for all of them. This study also discusses educational approaches to facilitate students’ motivation and deep learning.

Bombaerts, G., & Doulougeri, K. (2019, June), First-Year Engineering Students’ Experiences with a Course of Ethics and History of Technology Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32846

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2019 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015