Chetcuti, S. C., & Thomas, H. J., & Pafford, B. J. (2014, June), Flipping the Engineering Classroom: Results and Observations with Non-Engineering Students  Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--20511

\bibitem{asee_peer_20511}
  Chetcuti, S. C., \& Thomas, H. J., \& Pafford, B. J. (2014, June), \emph{Flipping the Engineering Classroom: Results and Observations with Non-Engineering Students}
  Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  10.18260/1-2--20511

Steven Chene Chetcuti, Hans J. Thomas P.E., and Brent J. Pafford.  "Flipping the Engineering Classroom: Results and Observations with Non-Engineering Students".  2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2014.  https://peer.asee.org/20511 Internet.  16 Dec, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_20511}
  Steven Chene Chetcuti, Hans J. Thomas P.E., and Brent J. Pafford.
  "Flipping the Engineering Classroom: Results and Observations with Non-Engineering Students".
  \emph{2014 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2014.
  https://peer.asee.org/20511 Internet.  16 Dec, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_20511
author = "Steven Chene Chetcuti, Hans J. Thomas P.E., and Brent J. Pafford"
title = "Flipping the Engineering Classroom: Results and Observations with Non-Engineering Students"
booktitle = "2014 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2014"
month = "June"
address = "Indianapolis, Indiana"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/20511}
number = {10.18260/1-2--20511}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  -                          Flipping the Engineering Classroom:               Results and Observations with Non-engineering Students        Flipping a classroom is an innovative teaching method in itself. This method facesadditional challenges when the students are not actually engineering majors. The purpose of thispaper is to discuss the development, implementation, and assessment of a flipped classroom for athermal-fluids course for non-engineering majors.        Problem solving is a critical component of engineering education; an engineering studentcannot only read problem statements or solely attend a lecture. However, duration of studentcontact in the classroom is constrained by credit hours. In a local survey, most students indicatedthat they would not take the time to complete not-for-grade problems on their own after class.For many of these students, graded homework assignments are the first and only experience theyhave in solving complex engineering problems prior to exams. By only receiving lectures andstruggling to work homework problems individually, it is arguable that few of these students areable to progress beyond the lower tiers of Bloom’s taxonomy. Historical time survey datasuggests that the students conduct little to no daily preparation when there are no gradedrequirements, and conversely show extremely large time spikes when out of class assignmentsare due or prior to in-class evaluations. Finally, in class lectures force an instructor to teach acertain amount of material in a limited timeframe irrespective of the rate at which each studentcan retain or comprehend that information regardless of the experience level of the student.        Inspired by the pedagogical concept of ‘flipping the classroom’ which has gained recentpopularity due in part to the work of the Khan Academy and its online instructional videos, and aclassical college teaching method whereby students would prepared prior to class and recited thetopic to their instructors and receive daily evaluations, the authors created a blended course thatleverages the digital age through video lectures before class and combined it with traditionalengineering problem solving in class. The goals of this blended course are as follows: improvethe quality and efficiency of student learning by conducting lectures outside of class andhomework during class; allow non-engineering students to learn each lesson’s material at theirown pace and provide a valuable study tool for exam preparation; increase the time spent inclassroom solving problems with instructors; leverage one-on-one time in the classroom wherethe instructor can better approach each individual’s issues; encourage and enable non-engineering students to take more responsibility for their learning and become lifelong learners;and inspire intellectual curiosity in the field of engineering. The instructors developedpreliminary beta test for the initial third of an undergraduate introductory course in thermal-fluidsystems and kept the remainder of the course unchanged from its traditional lecture method togain student feedback. This feedback was used to develop a completely blended courseconsisting of non-engineering majors which is currently being implemented and will conclude atthe end of the semester; the results of which will be studied and presented in this paper.
AU  - Steven Chene Chetcuti
AU  - Hans J. Thomas P.E.
AU  - Brent J. Pafford
CY  - Indianapolis, Indiana
DA  - 2014/06/15
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Flipping the Engineering Classroom: Results and Observations with Non-Engineering Students
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/20511
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--20511
ER  -