2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
San Antonio, Texas
February 9, 2025
February 9, 2025
February 11, 2025
Diversity and 2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions
23
https://peer.asee.org/54089
4
Hilda Cecilia Contreras Aguirre received an Ed.D. degree in Higher Education Leadership from Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi (TAMU-CC), and an M.Sc. from the University of Technology of Compiègne, France. She is now a researcher at New Mexico State University (NMSU). She focuses her research on qualitative studies addressing minority and underrepresented student college persistence, such as Latinas’ performance in STEM, mentoring, and Latinx’ research involvement in Engineering. She is also interested in participating in collaborative efforts promoting interdisciplinary research. Lastly, she is currently the PI and Director of the Research-Oriented Learning Experience (ROLE) in Engineering, a National Science Foundation-funded project, and the coordinator of a Latinx Femtoring/Mentoring program at NMSU.
Redwan Ul Haq Choyon is a PhD student in computer science at New Mexico State University. His research interests include HCI, human-robot interaction (HRI), brain-computer interaction (BCI), MR, asymmetry in games, wearable technology, inclusive design, disability studies, participatory design, and technology for children on the spectrum.
Luis Rodolfo GARCIA CARRILLO received the PhD. degree in Control Systems from the University of Technology of Compiègne, France. He was a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Center of Control, Dynamical systems and Computation at UC Santa Barbara, USA. He currently holds an Assistant Professor position with the Klipsch School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at New Mexico State University, USA.
Enrollment statistics at a Hispanic-serving institution (HSI) reveal that the number of students enrolled in Electrical Engineering (EE) graduate studies is considerably lower than those in undergraduate studies. This HSI enrolls a large Latinx and multicultural diverse student population. The apparent socio-economic conditions and educational equalities pose a challenge for this minority population to pursue graduate studies. After the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a notable shift towards hybrid and blended learning models. These approaches offer a combination of scheduled class sessions and self-paced classwork [1], providing students greater flexibility and agency in their learning. This is particularly beneficial for students who may face socio-economic or family-related challenges, as it allows them to adapt their learning to their individual circumstances. Therefore, the study’s purpose is to examine innovative approaches through mixed-reality (MR) spaces to improve learning and increase belonging among EE students at an HSI. Our long-term research agenda focuses on enhancing social learning among students, teaching assistants, and instructors, while also promoting collaboration using MR among learning community members.
Two research questions guided this study: What are the existing learning community issues at this particular HSI? How can these problems be addressed through a mixed-reality (MR) learning community platform?
To answer these questions, we take a multiple-sources qualitative research approach. First, we utilized participatory design (PD) methodology [2] in three two-hour sessions including activities such as storyboarding with focus group discussions, low-fidelity prototyping, and role-playing. Second, we interviewed EE students focusing on their socio-academic and learning community experiences. Nine students participated in the PD sessions, and five students participated in the interviews with an average length of thirty minutes per interview. Student participants were undergraduate juniors/seniors, and graduate students, some of them were non-traditional students. We conducted an inductive qualitative analysis from the sessions and interviews and triangulated the data from both sources.
Preliminary findings showed issues and challenges that EE students experience throughout their academic journeys preventing them from benefiting from peers’ collaboration and use of educational technological innovations. The first theme found existing learning community issues included a need for fostering a supportive and inclusive community. On this topic, Yamileth (pseudonym) a senior EE student mentioned,
"People that I started with have graduated because I had to go slower by taking a class here and there. I don't have the same group of friends … not everyone wants to do study groups, which is a little frustrating. So I end up mostly studying by myself."
Yamileth reflected on the lack of a supportive network that could make their engineering journey easier. A second theme identified the need for innovative technology integration in the EE community. In this regard, participants shared their vision for an MR platform that could include academic and social activities, a fair representation of themselves in the system, and navigational skills to deal with multiple learning technologies. Implications of this work consist of informing our existing efforts in designing technologies for supporting inclusive learning communities that other researchers can replicate in similar educational settings.
References [1] Rodriguez, A. (2020). Do hybrid classes offer the best of both world. CU Denver News. Retrieved December, 25, 2021. [2] Muller, M. J., & Kuhn, S. (1993). Participatory design. Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 24-28.
De Maurya, P., & Contreras Aguirre, H. C., & Platt, T. T., & Esparza, C. M., & CHOYON, R. U. H., & Hamilton, B., & Taylor, M. A., & Garcia Carrillo, L. R. (2025, February), Fostering an Inclusive Community Among Electrical Engineering Students with Mixed-Reality Technologies at a Hispanic-Serving Institution Paper presented at 2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD), San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/54089
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015