Honolulu, Hawaii
June 24, 2007
June 24, 2007
June 27, 2007
2153-5965
Mechanical Engineering
10
12.757.1 - 12.757.10
10.18260/1-2--1499
https://peer.asee.org/1499
397
Dr. Elvin Shields is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering. His research has been generously sponsored by a University Research Professorship during the 2005-2006 academic year at Youngstown State University. Since 1995, Dr. Shields has coached approximately 250 mechanical engineering students through nearly 90 capstone design projects ranging from collegiate competitions to industrial problems.
Fostering Creativity in the Capstone Engineering Design Experience
Abstract
Can creativity be fostered during the capstone engineering design experience? What promotes the creativity of undergraduate seniors in mechanical engineering? The ideal venue to answer these questions is Youngstown State University’s mandatory capstone design course sequence of two semesters, the goal of which is to prepare senior engineering students to become project leaders in industry. The capstone sequence includes a combination of lectures, case studies, visiting speakers, and team projects. Oral presentations and written reports promote the required communication skills for project leadership. Expectantly, improving creativity skills in project leaders will impact future engineering designs.
This capstone design class consisted of nine student design teams that synthesized, analyzed, manufactured, tested, and evaluated various projects for industry and other clients. Aspects of TRIZ, a Russian acronym for the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving, were incorporated into the existing capstone design instruction. The emphasis was on encouraging the students to think creatively using convergent methodology. Many real-world problems encompass multiple fields of engineering science involving open-ended problems and various possible solutions. The capstone design experience utilizes team projects to solve real-world problems through the application of TRIZ. Fostering creativity helps students to think in broader terms and enables them to become more innovative in finding solutions.
This research has two objectives: 1) to study the teaching of creativity in the capstone design experience and 2) to assess the effectiveness of the creativity instruction with pre-tests and post- tests using the Torrance12,13 Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) for adults. The results of the first year of this three year, outcome-oriented, process study are presented and discussed in this work.
Nomenclature
ABET = Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology AP = Academic Performance Nat’l %ile = National Percentile SD = Standard Deviation of data points TRIZ = Teoriya Resheniya Izobreatatelskikh Zadatch TTCT = Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking
Introduction
Barak2 states “The challenge in education is to find an optimal combination and balance between fostering activity based on openness and ‘disorder’, on the one hand, and imparting systematic methods for innovative thinking and problem-solving, on the other.” He presents a case study for the design and manufacture of hand tools. In this study, plant workers were trained in Systematic Innovative Thinking (SIT) and he credits this training with the development of new
Shields, E. (2007, June), Fostering Creativity In The Capstone Engineering Design Experience Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 10.18260/1-2--1499
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2007 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015