June 24, 2017
June 24, 2017
June 28, 2017
The job of a college engineering faculty member is multifaceted. Faculty are not only expected to teach and conduct research but also to write proposals, consult, network, engage in administrative duties, and the list continues. The relative importance and time allocated to these different functions varies according to the nature and focus of the institution and the interests of the faculty. However, graduate students aspiring to careers in academe are not usually trained in the multiple facets of the profession. As a result, they often struggle to find ways to balance the parallel and many times competing demands of these functions. Literature on the early careers of junior faculty at research institutions evidences their struggles to find such balance, particularly when their interests deviate from the requirements of a tenure-track position. This paper examines the professional development plans of engineering graduate students with an explicit interest in an academic career, as these plans are written and evolve throughout a three-credit graduate course at a large, research-intensive university. The overarching goal of this course, as stated on its syllabus, is to provide students with an opportunity to learn and practice the skills that complement and enhance classroom teaching and learning in a tenure-track faculty position , either at a research intensive university or at an institution that focuses on undergraduate engineering education . The research questions that orientate the study are: How do graduate students with different backgrounds and a common interest in academe conceive of the idea of balance in their future professional lives? How do their professional development plans reflect such conceptions?
The analysis of students’ professional development plans as qualitative artifacts reveals a wide variety of approaches to the role of faculty, focusing on different perspectives of it. Follow-up interviews with the students show that beneath these different approaches lies the idea of balance, evolved and transformed by the discussions and activities in the course.
Ortega-Alvarez, J. D., & Streveler, R. A., & Fentiman, A. W., & Aggarwal, H. W., & Biswas, S., & Coventry, B. S., & Hassan, A., & McNamara, M. L., & Paul, S. N. (2017, June), From Graduate Students to Faculty: Portraits of Balance in the Professional Development Plans of Engineering Graduate Students Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28390
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015