15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE)
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2024
July 28, 2024
July 30, 2024
8
10.18260/1-2--48598
https://peer.asee.org/48598
27
Juval Racelis is an Associate Professor specializing in writing pedagogy. His research focuses on pedagogical innovation across multiple contexts. In his teaching, he works in the intersections of writing, language, and culture to enrich students from diverse backgrounds.
Research on retention and persistence has shown the role that belonging and disciplinary connectedness can play in student self-efficacy and academic success. This has contributed to STEM curriculum innovations and first-year programming that has sought to foster disciplinary identity through engagement in undergraduate research and co-op programs. Such innovation and research are especially important for students from marginalized backgrounds who are often underrepresented in certain STEM fields.
While much research has investigated pedagogical innovations and curricular programming to address these issues, few studies have explored the nascent disciplinary orientations that first-year students bring with them as they transition from high school to their first year in college. This is particularly relevant for students who enter their first year with a declared STEM or design major. Exploring these conceptualizations of curriculum at a key point of transition can help elucidate ways to further foster students’ disciplinary identity, thereby contributing to persistence and self-efficacy.
In this paper, I analyze qualitative interviews of first-year engineering and design students to examine how students orient toward what it means to be an engineering student. Findings from this study reveal that many students who choose to be engineering or design majors bring with them STEM-oriented identities that are rooted in high school learning practices that focus on hands-on learning. This learning orientation suggests that students’ nascent disciplinary identities are epistemologically oriented toward certain ways of knowing. These findings have implications for student self-efficacy and persistence in engineering-related coursework such as the hard sciences and technical writing where connections to their discipline may not always be immediately apparent.
Racelis, J. V. (2024, July), Full Paper: Examining first-year students’ nascent disciplinary identities and epistemological orientations Paper presented at 15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE), Boston, Massachusetts. 10.18260/1-2--48598
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015