Asee peer logo

Fundamentals for Assessment Success: A Sustainable Data Organization Strategy Within a Construction Management Technology Program

Download Paper |


2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition


Seattle, Washington

Publication Date

June 14, 2015

Start Date

June 14, 2015

End Date

June 17, 2015





Conference Session

ETAC/ABET Related Issues

Tagged Division

Engineering Technology

Page Count


Page Numbers

26.807.1 - 26.807.12



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors


J. William White AIA Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

visit author page

J. William White AIA is a lecturer with the Construction Engineering Management Technology program
within the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology in Indianapolis. He is a registered architect
who has more than 23 years of varied construction industry experience. Mr. White has undergraduate
degrees from Indiana University and Ball State University and a masters degree from Purdue University
Indianapolis. He is an active member of the American Institute of Architects and the Construction Specifi-
cations Institute.

visit author page


Veto Matthew Ray Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

visit author page

Mr. Matt Ray is a lecturer for the Construction Engineering Management Technology Program offered through the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indian University Purdue University Indianapolis. He currently provides instruction for Construction Project Costs and Productivity Control, Construction Cost and Bidding, Wood, Timber and Formwork Analysis and Design as well as managing a Certificate of Training in Asset Management. He is a graduate of Purdue School of Engineering and Technology receiving degrees in Construction Technology, Architectural Technology and a Masters in Facility Management. His field experience includes residential and light commercial construction. He has been an architectural designer as well as superintendent for single and multi-family residential construction projects. Mr. Ray worked as an engineering design manager in the Building Components Manufacturing Industry for over fifteen years.

visit author page

author page

Elaine M. Cooney Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Download Paper |


Fundamentals for Assessment Success: A Sustainable Data Organization Strategy within a Construction Management Technology ProgramFew events within a successful academic program are as administratively demanding as an on-site accreditation assessment visit. It is a particularly stressful period where a program mustfully account for itself by presenting evidence to external evaluators that its students, faculty,alumni, administrators, curriculum, policies, resources, and facilities satisfy a rigorous criteriaestablished by an accrediting body. To accomplish this, the program must retrieve all of therelevant data, compile it into a prodigious report and organize it in a manner that is bothprofoundly clear and obvious while simultaneously complying with the report formatrequirements prescribed by the accrediting institution. Anyone who has experienced an on-siteaccreditation visit is very familiar with these daunting challenges.A number of factors seem to conspire against the successful execution of this documentationprocess. One of the most fundamental is the complexity associated with the ongoing,sustainable, semester-to-semester compilation of data from a myriad of different sources. Ofthese various sources, faculty is one of the most critical. It is the faculty after all, that is theorigin of the assessment data that forms the bedrock of any program’s assessment regimen. Thischallenge is compounded if the program is heavily dependent on adjunct faculty. Manyeducational institutions that offer a technology-based curriculum are particularly reliant onadjunct faculty. Clearly adjunct faculty is highly valued in technology programs for its course –specific expertise and industry correlation. However this faculty is typically teaching as asupplement to a separate full time career and therefore does not have the resources available todevote to a protracted or confusing assessment routine.The challenge is this: in order to compile a successful assessment report, a sustainable programmust be established that distills the complex assessment requirements into components that canbe easily and efficiently executed by its faculty. The reporting system must be sufficiently clearand unambiguous such that it becomes a part of the semester close-out routine. Additionally, areporting system must be developed that efficiently captures crucial assessment data, making itavailable for systematic review at the conclusion of every semester and ultimately for inclusionin the accreditation report.This paper will focus on methods and tools that were developed by a construction managementtechnology program to successfully address this challenge. The tools described will include:  Simplified, unambiguous forms that capture assessment data  A reporting system to facilitate data dissemination  A formalized process that ensures collaboration through the utilization of the captured data on a regular, end-of-semester routine  Implementation of an assessment routine that clearly links course data to outcomes to program.The paper will document the process of a construction management technology program as itdeveloped its own ultimately successful assessment structure.

White, J. W., & Ray, V. M., & Cooney, E. M. (2015, June), Fundamentals for Assessment Success: A Sustainable Data Organization Strategy Within a Construction Management Technology Program Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24144

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015