Asee peer logo

Future Time Perspective and Self-Regulated Learning: Multiple Case Studies in Industrial Engineering

Download Paper |


2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition


New Orleans, Louisiana

Publication Date

June 26, 2016

Start Date

June 26, 2016

End Date

August 28, 2016





Conference Session

Student Success II: Self-Regulatory, Metacognitive, and Professional Skills

Tagged Division

Educational Research and Methods

Page Count




Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors


Justine Chasmar Clemson University

visit author page

Justine Chasmar is a coordinator in the Academic Success Center and a PhD candidate in the Engineering and Science Education Department at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and M.S. in Mathematical Sciences from Clemson University.

visit author page


Lisa Benson Clemson University

visit author page

Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incorporating engineering into secondary science and mathematics classrooms. Her education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University.

visit author page

Download Paper |


The overarching goal of this research paper is understanding the motivations and attitudes of students in engineering majors, which is vital to answering the call for increasing the number of engineering graduates. Our project aim is to study students’ future time perspective (FTP), a type of motivation relating how students view their future and how they act in the present. In particular, we are studying Industrial Engineering (IE) majors and how their FTP affects their present use of self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies. We are interested in SRL strategy use because students who are self-regulated have been shown to achieve higher academic success and graduate at a higher rate. This study is a pilot of a larger, mixed methods sequential explanatory study that aims to capture the experience of each participant in regards to their SRL strategy use and its connection with the student’s FTP.

Three categories of FTP have been identified in previous qualitative work of engineering undergraduates. Students from each category differ in perceived instrumentality of tasks, short versus long term goal setting, and perceptions of their future. Additionally, SRL has been well-documented for students, such as the development of the Self-Regulated Learning Scale (SRLIS). However, little is known about how the types of SRL strategies students utilize in the present are related to their FTPs.

The quantitative portion of this study describes a cluster analysis based on a motivation survey that characterizes students’ FTP, which was completed by XX IE undergraduates at our institution. The qualitative portion of our study comprises case studies of four IE students. We piloted a semi-structured interview protocol to assess connections between students’ FTP and SRL use. Each interview was transcribed, read multiple times, and coded separately before a cross-case analysis. The FTP section of the interviews were coded using a previously established a priori coding scheme. The SRL items were a priori coded based on the SRLIS framework. Then, each interview was coded for the connection between FTP and SRL using emergent coding.

Students with one FTP type typically have an open view of the future; this allows for varying degrees of instrumentality of present tasks as they do not set a long-term goal after graduation. Analysis of an interview of this type of student featured broad and short-term goal setting, such as “get through this semester.” Additionally, this student described an ill-defined view of the future with several stated desired outcomes and high perceived instrumentality for coursework and course specific tasks. These are common themes found in previous literature for this type of FTP. The student described a a strong use of SRL strategies and a connection of this use with high perceived instrumentality and the desire for a high GPA. The full paper will describe further connections between SRL strategies and FTPs in the remaining three case studies.

Chasmar, J., & Benson, L. (2016, June), Future Time Perspective and Self-Regulated Learning: Multiple Case Studies in Industrial Engineering Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26994

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015