July 26, 2021
July 26, 2021
July 19, 2022
Women in Engineering
Historically and currently, women are underrepresented in engineering. Women who do pursue engineering overcome isolation, chilly climates in labs, classes, and in teams to succeed. These experiences speak to the human aspects of a campus and disciplinary climate. However, another aspect of women’s underrepresentation in engineering is under-studied: Their representation in the physical spaces of the academic environment. These physical spaces include not only buildings, signage, and accessibility, but also the artwork, wall hangings, and historical artifacts displayed to decorate the structures. Such artifacts influence behaviors and sense of belonging for the members of a campus community .
This work-in-progress paper examines the diversity featured in the human imagery that decorates the walls of one biomedical engineering department, focusing on the representations of women. Spanning two buildings, this BME department is home to ~1200 undergraduates, and 300 graduate students. These buildings contain classrooms, team-based learning spaces, labs, offices, conference rooms, and common areas.
For this paper, we inventoried all images within the publicly accessible spaces in the department buildings during January 2019. The data we collected included the location, the artifact itself, as well as (inferred) identifications of gender, race, and ethnicity. Preliminary findings indicate that though women and men were pictured in relatively equal numbers, those representations are not equal in several ways. The finding we explore in this work-in-progress paper is the problematic ways in which women are represented. We argue that this imagery reinforces sexist norms as well as messaging about and to women in engineering disciplines. For instance, cartoon images promoting lab safety portrayed a stereotypical cartoon character of a male scientist as models of safe practices in contrast to a stereotypically female character who does not. Mirroring prior work in other settings , our findings have significant implications for women’s experiences in the engineering discipline.
References:  C.C. Strange and J. H. Banning, Designing for Learning: Creating Campus Environments for Student Success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, 2015.
 Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, “Portray Her: Representations of Women STEM Characters in Media,” The Lyda Hill Foundation & The Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, 2020.
Morgan, K. L., & Bernardo, A., & Fernandez, T. M. (2021, July), Gender and Human Imagery in the Halls of a BME Department Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37219
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2021 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015