Salt Lake City, Utah
June 20, 2004
June 20, 2004
June 23, 2004
2153-5965
11
9.637.1 - 9.637.11
10.18260/1-2--13721
https://peer.asee.org/13721
517
Session 1471
General Engineering at Harvey Mudd: 1957–2003
Anthony Bright, Clive L. Dym Department of Engineering HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE Claremont, CA 91711–5990 E-mail: clive_dym@hmc.edu Telephone: 909–621–8853 Fax: 909–621–8967
Abstract This paper describes the genesis and evolution of the philosophy of the Harvey Mudd College general engineering program. This program was established with a sound theoretical base strongly coupled to the realism of engineering practice. Thus, the paper also describes the development of the Harvey Mudd Clinic program — Harvey Mudd’s three-semester capstone experience — to bring professional practice to on-campus students, as well as the first-year design course (E4) that exposes students to client-based design work as the cornerstone of its program. The emerging concept of engineering as the “liberal education of the 21st century” is also cited to emphasize the centrality of the engineering design paradigm — that is, design as the cornerstone or the backbone — in defining the discipline of Engineering. The implications of this analysis for undergraduate engineering education are discussed. The paper concludes with suggestions for realizing an undergraduate program in Engineering that is current, vital, distinctive and consistent with the idea of engineering being a single discipline.
Introduction Engineering at Harvey Mudd College is a non-specialized multidisciplinary program, awarding an undesignated BS degree. The engineering major comprises one-third of the requirements for a student to graduate from the college, with another third in humanities and social science, and the remaining third in a mathematics and fundamental science common core. Engineering sciences and engineering systems courses complement the engineering design experience of the first-year projects course (E4) and the junior and senior year Engineering Clinic courses bringing professional practice to campus through industry-sponsored projects.
The program was recently classified 1 as a “philosophical Engineering program” based on certain defining characteristics, including a strong liberal education background and “the philosophy that such an education has intrinsic advantages over discipline-specific alternatives.” This paper describes the genesis and evolution of the Harvey Mudd engineering philosophy growing out of a
Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education
Dym, C., & Bright, A. (2004, June), General Engineering At Harvey Mudd: 1957–2003 Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--13721
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2004 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015