Montreal, Quebec, Canada
June 22, 2025
June 22, 2025
August 15, 2025
First-Year Programs Division (FPD)
9
https://peer.asee.org/56660
Benjamin D. McPheron serves as the Assistant Dean for Academic and Student Affairs in the T.J. Smull College of Engineering at Ohio Northern University. He also holds rank of Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering. Dr. McPheron received his B.S.E.E. in Electrical Engineering at Ohio Northern University in 2010 and his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2014 from The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Many student success structures take a deficit-based, or problem-based, approach, treating student challenges as problems to be solved. In these approaches, it is common to develop prescriptive, problem-focused planning, which may increase feelings of shame and inferiority in struggling students, leading to a feeling of disconnectedness, disengagement, and for many students, a breakdown in the student success system. Not only can these approaches potentially harm students, they can also be detrimental to student success professionals. These professionals may develop a sense of paternalism in solving problems for students and may also experience burnout or disengagement when these interventions fail.
One alternative approach is a strengths-based, or asset-based, approach. This method helps students discover and leverage their intrinsic individual strengths in hopes of helping them succeed by shifting the focus to student assets. Additional factors considered in the strengths-based approach include extrinsic assets such as relationships, resources, and community funds of knowledge.
In this work, a deficit-based ‘Student Improvement Plan’ (SIP) is reimagined as an asset-based ‘Student Development Plan’ (SDP). The intent is to assist students in developing study and life skills that will allow them to grow beyond their historical academic challenges and apply these skills long-term, even as students move beyond their first year. Practically, the plan includes changes in language to make it feel less punitive, as well as additional prompts to enable students to participate in identifying their strengths, specifying academic development strategies, and committing to practices for holistic wellness.
The re-envisioned plan is designed for first-year engineering students who earn under a 2.0 GPA in the fall semester, and is also required for students on Continued Probation (less than 2.0 cumulative GPA for two consecutive semesters).
To assess the effectiveness of this method, a comparative analysis will be conducted between students who participated in the deficit-based SIP and those who participate in the asset-based SDP, focusing on changes in their average cumulative and semester GPAs. The baseline data will be presented, along with results for a pilot group under the new plan.
McPheron, B. D. (2025, June), GIFTS: Reimagining a Student Academic Success Program in Terms of Development Rather than Improvement Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . https://peer.asee.org/56660
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015