Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: Designing Program Educational Objectives
- Conference
- Location
-
Austin, Texas
- Publication Date
-
June 14, 2009
- Start Date
-
June 14, 2009
- End Date
-
June 17, 2009
- ISSN
-
2153-5965
- Conference Session
- Tagged Division
-
Industrial Engineering
- Page Count
-
9
- Page Numbers
-
14.651.1 - 14.651.9
- DOI
-
10.18260/1-2--5624
- Permanent URL
-
https://peer.asee.org/5624
- Download Count
-
350
Paper Authors
Jane Fraser Colorado State University, Pueblo
Jane M. Fraser is chair of the Department of Engineering at Colorado State University-Pueblo. She was formerly on the faculty at the Ohio State University and Purdue University. She has a BA in mathematics from Swarthmore College and MS and PhD in industrial engineering and operations research from the University of California-Berkeley.
Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract
Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: Designing Program Educational Objectives
Abstract
Industrial Engineering programs prepare graduates for a wide range of jobs in a wide range of industries. Having faculty members choose a focus for a program, design a new program, or redesign an existing Industrial Engineering program can be contentious. This paper presents a method, using descriptions of real jobs, to help faculty members talk about the types of jobs for which the program is preparing graduates and to talk about how well the program is preparing graduates for those jobs. The method allows agreements and disagreements to emerge and provides a way to talk about them. This method has obvious applications in designing program educational objectives and in reviewing and updating program educational objectives to reflect current needs of industry. Using current job descriptions focuses these conversations and helps maintain currency of the program.
Introduction
To design a curriculum based on ABET-EAC criteria, one works backward, as shown in Figure 1.
Program Courses Program Program educational outcomes objectives
Figure 1: Flowchart for curriculum design
Program educational objectives (PEOs), which are “broad statements that describe the career and professional accomplishments that the program is preparing graduates to achieve,” are used to determine program outcomes, which are “narrower statements that describe what students are expected to know and be able to do by the time of graduation.” Since program outcomes “relate to the skills, knowledge, and behaviors that students acquire in their matriculation through the program,” they are used to design the program, which consists of courses, designed to make up the program.
Thus, Criterion 2 is the starting point for designing a program. The most recent ABET statement1 about Criterion 2 is:
“Criterion 2. Program Educational Objectives Each program for which an institution seeks accreditation or reaccreditation must have in place: (a) published educational objectives that are consistent with the mission of the institution and these criteria
Fraser, J. (2009, June), Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: Designing Program Educational Objectives Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--5624
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2009 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015