St. Louis, Missouri
June 18, 2000
June 18, 2000
June 21, 2000
2153-5965
14
5.322.1 - 5.322.14
10.18260/1-2--8416
https://peer.asee.org/8416
497
Session: 2330
Graduate Engineering Student Performance Assessment: How learning pattern affects test scores
Timothy Chang, New Jersey Institute of Technology, NJ and Daphne Chang, Bloomfield College, NJ
Abstract
In this paper, the findings based on a graduate electrical engineering course titled “Real- Time Control Systems Design” are analyzed and reported. This course comprises of a lecture and laboratory component where the students are expected to transform their theoretical knowledge into a viable team laboratory design and present the results to the entire class. Upon running this course for seven consecutive years, the following observations are, invariably, made: 1. A bimodal distribution exists between theory and experiment: Students achieving the best classroom scores do not always perform well in a free structure design- based experimental project. Similarly, students who rank in the lower quartile for classroom performance may excel in the experimental project. 2. Composition of team members significantly affects the quality of the experiment. Standard indicators such as GPA do not strongly correlate with the experimental outcome. 3. Strong classroom participation does not correlate with overall course success.
Administering the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator during the last two years provided an extra analytical dimension. From the MBTI test data and course grades, it is concluded that the “learning patterns” play a significant role in student performance and specifically, in relations to issues 1-3 above. Based on the combined results, a number of recommendations are brought forth for improving curriculum design and student assessment at the graduate level.
1. Introduction
Engineering differs from most other education fields in that the graduates are expected to be able to transform their classroom experience into the industrial environment which requires critical thinking, design abilities, team-work, management skills; in additional to fundamental scientific/engineering knowledge. The definition of a qualified graduate, from the educational institute’s perspective, should reflect the student’s ability to thrive
Chang, T. N., & Chang, D. L. (2000, June), Graduate Engineering Student Performance Assessment: How Learning Pattern Affects Test Score Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 10.18260/1-2--8416
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2000 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015