Graduate student myths: interpreting the Ph.D. student experience through the lens of social media, memes, and stereotypes
- Conference
- Location
-
Baltimore , Maryland
- Publication Date
-
June 25, 2023
- Start Date
-
June 25, 2023
- End Date
-
June 28, 2023
- Conference Session
- Tagged Division
-
Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
- Tagged Topic
-
Diversity
- Page Count
-
22
- DOI
-
10.18260/1-2--43825
- Permanent URL
-
https://peer.asee.org/43825
- Download Count
-
192
Paper Authors
Julie M. Rieland University of Michigan
Julie received her B.S. in Materials Science and Engineering from University of Michigan in 2018. She is now at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, where she is finishing out her PhD in the Macromolecular Science and Engineering Program. She is just starting research in the area of engineering education with an interest in mental health and culture.
Shamalee Goonetilleke University of Michigan
Sarah Jane Bork
University of Michigan
orcid.org/0000-0002-4344-554X
Sarah received her B.S. and M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the Ohio State University in 2017, and her M.S. in Engineering Education Research from the University of Michigan in 2020. As a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education Research at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Sarah is studying the mental health experiences of engineering graduate students.
Aaron W. Johnson University of Michigan
Aaron W. Johnson (he/him/his) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. He believes in a strong connection between engineering education research and practice, and his research leverages his experience teaching engineering science courses to bridge the gap between theoretical, well-defined coursework and ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. He received a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Michigan, and a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Prior to re-joining Michigan, he was an instructor in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder.
Abstract
In graduate student-oriented online spaces, students often portray themselves as miserable, depicting these negative themes through combinations of text and images called memes. Memes in this context are a symbolic language that is used to convey cultural ideas through established templates that draw from pop-culture media and various youth subcultures. Through this medium, graduate students share and process their experiences communally, using memes as a coping mechanism. Collectively students tend to acknowledge that the culture around graduate school is bad; however, less is known about how students navigate and respond to this culture. In this paper we use a mixed method design to assess graduate student experience in relation to common stereotypes self-attributed by graduate students in public online communities. The aim of this study is to answer the following questions:
RQ1: How do senior PhD students and recent graduates understand their experience through the lens of common stereotypes about graduate student life?
RQ2: How do these experiences differ between graduate students based on background, positionality, and career trajectory?
In this work, we performed a mixed method study triangulating survey and interview data. We developed a pool of memes and graduate student oriented advice columns then used thematic analysis to identify 9 discrete themes about the graduate student experience. These 9 themes were the basis for a 9-question structured interview protocol and pre-interview survey. Participants (N=15) were recruited through convenience sampling and self-selected from the list of 9 questions which ones to discuss via the pre-interview survey. We present on three of these themes focusing on 1) work-life-balance, 2) imposter syndrome, and 3) burnout. Thematic coding of the interviews was used to triangulate pre-interview survey responses. We found that students generally disagreed with the negative themes of the questions and that memes tended to exaggerate these features of graduate student experience. However, emergent themes of self-efficacy in our analysis demonstrated how student self-beliefs influenced their experience and mental health during graduate school. We also found that graduate students’ perception of their experience is influenced by students’ gender, nationality, and could influence student career trajectories. The results from our work highlight the ongoing concerns with graduate school culture, and how it can disadvantage certain groups. Further, this work can help identify student support mechanisms that can be instituted at the individual, program, and college level to promote student retention and mental health.
Rieland, J. M., & Goonetilleke, S., & Bork, S. J., & Johnson, A. W. (2023, June), Graduate student myths: interpreting the Ph.D. student experience through the lens of social media, memes, and stereotypes Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43825
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015