Graduate Student Peer Mentoring: A Means for Creating an Engineering Education Research Community

Brook Sattler; Adam R. Carberry; Lauren D. Thomas

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Publication Date: June 10, 2012
Start Date: June 10, 2012
End Date: June 13, 2012
ISSN: 2153-5965
Conference Session: Research and Graduate Studies
Tagged Division: Graduate Studies
Page Count: 8
Page Numbers: 25.677.1 - 25.677.8
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--21434
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/21434
Download Count: 535

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Brook Sattler University of Washington

visit author page

Brook Sattler is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington. Her dissertation focuses on mechanisms for supporting engineering student development, specifically self-authorship.

visit author page

biography

Adam R. Carberry Arizona State University orcid.org/0000-0003-0041-7060

visit author page

Adam R. Carberry is an Assistant Professor in the College of Technology and Innovation, Department of Engineering, at Arizona State University. He earned a B.S. in materials science engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in chemistry and engineering education, respectively. His research interests include student conceptions, engineering epistemological beliefs, self-efficacy, and service-learning.

visit author page

author page

Lauren D. Thomas Virginia Tech

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

GEECS Peer Mentoring: A Means for Creating an Engineering Education Research CommunityEngineering education research (EER) is in a pivotal time as a developing field. For example, theJournal of Engineering Education has grown into a premier scholarly journal that encourageshighly empirically-based research. Many institutions around the world are now offering research-based graduate degrees in engineering education, which has increased the need for facultytrained to conduct rigorous EER. These rapid changes appear to be just the beginning of majortransformations of the field, especially in regards to where graduate students are being trained.While many students are now being educated in departments of engineering education (e.g.,Purdue and Virginia Tech), most emerging engineering education researchers are or have beentrained in other engineering disciplines or in the liberal arts (e.g., education, psychology, or childdevelopment). These emerging researchers often learn in isolation from other EER graduatestudents. This isolation has become one of the major driving forces for the creation of theGraduate Engineering Education Consortium for Students (GEECS). The purpose of GEECS isto provide a community for graduate students, especially those dispersed throughout the nation.The GEECS mission is: GEECS brings together emerging researchers in engineering education to create a supportive network. Our mission is to enhance each other’s scholarly, professional and personal development through collaboration, encouragement, knowledge sharing, and critical and reflective analysis as we contribute to the engineering education discipline.To fulfill the GEECS mission, there exists an opportunity to personally and professionallysupport one another through such things as peer mentoring. Peer mentoring is small workinggroups of EER graduate students who connect monthly via conference calls. These long distancemeetings afford students the opportunity to engage in setting goals, monitoring each other’sprogress, and giving/receiving feedback. Students encourage each other to set both high andspecific goals related to a work-life balance (i.e., research, service, teaching, and personal goals).In addition to goal setting and monitoring, students provide one another with feedback on currentwork. In this paper, we discuss the progress of two peer mentoring groups through an in-depthcase study analysis. These two cases are based on the authors’ experiences in both developingand contributing to the peer mentoring groups. In this paper, we describe how GEECS peermentoring works and its purpose to grow a community of EER scholars.

Citation
Format

Sattler, B., & Carberry, A. R., & Thomas, L. D. (2012, June), Graduate Student Peer Mentoring: A Means for Creating an Engineering Education Research Community Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--21434

TY - CPAPER
AB - GEECS Peer Mentoring: A Means for Creating an Engineering Education Research CommunityEngineering education research (EER) is in a pivotal time as a developing field. For example, theJournal of Engineering Education has grown into a premier scholarly journal that encourageshighly empirically-based research. Many institutions around the world are now offering research-based graduate degrees in engineering education, which has increased the need for facultytrained to conduct rigorous EER. These rapid changes appear to be just the beginning of majortransformations of the field, especially in regards to where graduate students are being trained.While many students are now being educated in departments of engineering education (e.g.,Purdue and Virginia Tech), most emerging engineering education researchers are or have beentrained in other engineering disciplines or in the liberal arts (e.g., education, psychology, or childdevelopment). These emerging researchers often learn in isolation from other EER graduatestudents. This isolation has become one of the major driving forces for the creation of theGraduate Engineering Education Consortium for Students (GEECS). The purpose of GEECS isto provide a community for graduate students, especially those dispersed throughout the nation.The GEECS mission is: GEECS brings together emerging researchers in engineering education to create a supportive network. Our mission is to enhance each other’s scholarly, professional and personal development through collaboration, encouragement, knowledge sharing, and critical and reflective analysis as we contribute to the engineering education discipline.To fulfill the GEECS mission, there exists an opportunity to personally and professionallysupport one another through such things as peer mentoring. Peer mentoring is small workinggroups of EER graduate students who connect monthly via conference calls. These long distancemeetings afford students the opportunity to engage in setting goals, monitoring each other’sprogress, and giving/receiving feedback. Students encourage each other to set both high andspecific goals related to a work-life balance (i.e., research, service, teaching, and personal goals).In addition to goal setting and monitoring, students provide one another with feedback on currentwork. In this paper, we discuss the progress of two peer mentoring groups through an in-depthcase study analysis. These two cases are based on the authors’ experiences in both developingand contributing to the peer mentoring groups. In this paper, we describe how GEECS peermentoring works and its purpose to grow a community of EER scholars.
AU - Brook Sattler
AU - Adam R. Carberry
AU - Lauren D. Thomas
CY - San Antonio, Texas
DA - 2012/06/10
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Graduate Student Peer Mentoring: A Means for Creating an Engineering Education Research Community
UR - https://peer.asee.org/21434
DO - 10.18260/1-2--21434
ER -